Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1992 Jan-Feb;2(1):42-57.
doi: 10.2165/00002512-199202010-00006.

Pressure sores. Epidemiology and current management concepts

Affiliations
Review

Pressure sores. Epidemiology and current management concepts

J B Young et al. Drugs Aging. 1992 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Pressure sores remain common, with a prevalence of 5 to 9% and more than 70% occurring in patients over 70 years of age. They are often falsely ascribed to poor nursing care, but can more usefully be regarded as a potentially preventable complication of an acute immobility illness. Prevention involves identification of patients at risk, appropriate nursing care measures and the use of special equipment. Much of the special equipment is excessively complex and not validated by clinical trial work. The airwave system, polystyrene bead bed system and Vaperm mattress have been best studied and are effective. Management of the established sore involves treatment of the underlying medical condition(s), attention to hydration and nutrition, prevention of further tissue trauma and the use of special dressings and procedures which facilitate the inflammatory repair response. There is considerable doubt about the use of 'traditional' wound applications such as gauze or chlorinated lime and boric acid solution ('Eusol'). An extensive range of newer products is now available but these have not yet been subjected to controlled clinical trials. A useful starting point is to classify pressure sores into 4 clinical types depending on amount of tissue damage and depth of ulcer. The least severe sore (type 1) can be protected using polyurethane film dressings. Deeper ulcers (types 2 and 3) can be easily and quickly treated by hydrocolloid or alginate dressings which optimise the local wound environment, thus facilitating tissue repair. However, there may be no satisfactory dressing for sacral (near-anal) sores which are more difficult to treat than those at other body sites because of dressing detachment. Cavity ulcers (type 4) can be managed with silastic foam or hydrocolloid or alginate dressings. Debridement of necrotic material is best done manually by scalpel/scissors, although streptokinase/streptodornase (Varidase Topical) may also help if used correctly. Antiseptics have little part to play and ulcers are best cleaned with warm normal saline. Systemic antibiotics are indicated only when surrounding cellulitis is present, although metronidazole is useful for malodorous sores.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda). 1964;10:147-55 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1968 Jun 1;2(5604):561 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1973 Aug 11;2(7824):309 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1989 Jan 7;1(8628):57 - PubMed
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 Jan;63(1):17-20 - PubMed