Measurements of occupational exposure for a technologist performing 18F FDG PET scans
- PMID: 15551792
- DOI: 10.1097/01.hp.0000137180.85643.9d
Measurements of occupational exposure for a technologist performing 18F FDG PET scans
Abstract
Radiation doses to one PET technologist performing 100 18F FDG (18F fluorodeoxyglucose) imaging procedures were measured in a clinical setting using two types of thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) badges, one finger-ring TLD and one electronic pocket dosimeter (EPD). 18F FDG was handled either with unshielded or with viewing window tungsten shielded syringes. The resulting doses using unshielded syringes were 13.8 +/- 0.8 microSv/370 MBq and 14.3 +/- 0.4 microSv/370 MBq, measured with TLD 100 and with TLD 700H/600H, respectively. For the same series of measurements, the doses obtained using shielded syringes were 10.7 +/- 0.4 microSv/370 MBq and 7.2 +/- 2.1 microSv/370 MBq with TLD700H/600H and with EPD, respectively. The dose to the right hand from shielded syringes was 69.3 +/- 5.5 microSv/370 MBq. All these values are within the ICRP recommended dose limits. Extrapolated to 725 examinations per year, the resulting effective dose measured with TLD would be 10 mSv with unshielded and 7.5 mSv with shielded syringes, respectively (25% dose reduction). The doses measured by TLD were consistently higher than those measured by EPD, suggesting that EPD measurements might underestimate occupational doses.
Similar articles
-
Technologist radiation exposure in routine clinical practice with 18F-FDG PET.J Nucl Med Technol. 2005 Sep;33(3):175-9. J Nucl Med Technol. 2005. PMID: 16145226
-
Radiation dose to PET technologists and strategies to lower occupational exposure.J Nucl Med Technol. 2005 Mar;33(1):44-7. J Nucl Med Technol. 2005. PMID: 15731021
-
Doses to nuclear technicians in a dedicated PET/CT centre utilising 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG).Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007;123(2):246-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncl141. Epub 2006 Sep 20. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2007. PMID: 16987913
-
Practical aspects of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu][DOTA0, Tyr3]octreotate.Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Dec;50(4):265-71. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006. PMID: 17043624 Review.
-
Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures.Health Phys. 2008 Mar;94(3):211-27. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000290614.76386.35. Health Phys. 2008. PMID: 18301095 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of the Frequency and Type of Procedures Performed in Nuclear Medicine Units on the Expected Radiological Hazard.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;20(6):5206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065206. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36982115 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of a new protocol for ¹⁸F-FDG infusion using an automatic combined dispenser and injector system.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Nov;39(11):1720-9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2174-0. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012. PMID: 22740098
-
Statistical analysis of the occupational radiation doses in three different positron emission tomography-computed tomography centers in Egypt.World J Nucl Med. 2019 Jul-Sep;18(3):287-292. doi: 10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_42_18. World J Nucl Med. 2019. PMID: 31516373 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive evaluation of occupational radiation exposure to intraoperative and perioperative personnel from 18F-FDG radioguided surgical procedures.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Nov;35(11):2026-34. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0880-4. Epub 2008 Jul 10. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008. PMID: 18618106
-
Automated Injectors versus Manual Administration: A Comparative Analysis of Radiation Exposure Reduction in 18 F-FDG Delivery.World J Nucl Med. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):36-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791781. eCollection 2025 Mar. World J Nucl Med. 2024. PMID: 39959151 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical