Mucoadhesive delivery systems. I. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers for buccal tablet formulation
- PMID: 15554223
- DOI: 10.1081/ddc-200037245
Mucoadhesive delivery systems. I. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers for buccal tablet formulation
Abstract
Different types of mucoadhesive polymers, intended for buccal tablet formulation, were investigated for their comparative mucoadhesive force, swelling behavior, residence time and surface pH. The selected polymers were carbopols (CP934, and CP940), polycarbophil (PC), sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (SCMC) and pectin representing the anionic type, while chitosan (Ch) as cationic polymer and hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC) as a non-ionic polymer. Results revealed that polyacrylic acid derivatives (PAA) showed the highest bioadhesion force, prolonged residence time and high surface acidity. SCMC and chitosan ensured promising bioadhesive characteristics, whilst HPMC and pectin exhibited weaker bioadhesion. Different polymer combinations as well as formulations were evaluated to improve the mucoadhesive performance of the tablets. Bioadhesive tablet formulations containing either 5% CP934, 65% HPMC and 30% spray-dried lactose or 2% PC, 68% HPMC and 30% mannitol showed optimum mucoadhesion and suitable residence time. SCMC, when formulated individually, exhibited promising bioadhesion, acceptable swelling, convenient residence time and surface pH. In-vivo trials of these formulations proved non-irritative and prolonged residence of the mucoadhesive tablets on human buccal mucosa for 8 to 13 h.
Similar articles
-
Mucoadhesive delivery systems. II. Formulation and in-vitro/in-vivo evaluation of buccal mucoadhesive tablets containing water-soluble drugs.Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004;30(9):995-1004. doi: 10.1081/ddc-200037226. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2004. PMID: 15554224 Clinical Trial.
-
Carvedilol-loaded mucoadhesive buccal tablets: influence of various mucoadhesive polymers on drug release behavior.PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2009 May-Jun;63(3):196-206. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2009. PMID: 20069792
-
Design and In Vitro/In Vivo Evaluation of Ultra-Thin Mucoadhesive Buccal Film Containing Fluticasone Propionate.AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017 Jan 1;18(1):93-103. doi: 10.1208/s12249-016-0496-0. Epub 2016 Feb 16. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2017. PMID: 26883262
-
The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery.Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005 Nov 3;57(11):1666-91. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Sep 23. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005. PMID: 16183164 Review.
-
Current Status of Mucoadhesive Gel Systems for Buccal Drug Delivery.Curr Pharm Des. 2021;27(17):2015-2025. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666210316101528. Curr Pharm Des. 2021. PMID: 33726644 Review.
Cited by
-
Green Nanotechnology in the Formulation of a Novel Solid Dispersed Multilayered Core-Sheath Raloxifene-Loaded Nanofibrous Buccal Film; In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization.Pharmaceutics. 2021 Apr 1;13(4):474. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13040474. Pharmaceutics. 2021. PMID: 33915828 Free PMC article.
-
Mucosal Applications of Poloxamer 407-Based Hydrogels: An Overview.Pharmaceutics. 2018 Sep 12;10(3):159. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10030159. Pharmaceutics. 2018. PMID: 30213143 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Designing of the mucoadhesive intravaginal spermicidal films.Indian J Pharm Sci. 2010 Sep;72(5):652-5. doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.78540. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2010. PMID: 21695003 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of HPMC and mannitol on drug release and bioadhesion behavior of buccal discs of buspirone hydrochloride: In-vitro and in-vivo pharmacokinetic studies.Saudi Pharm J. 2015 Jul;23(3):315-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Dec 8. Saudi Pharm J. 2015. PMID: 26106280 Free PMC article.
-
Bioadhesive behaviors of HPMC E5: comparative analysis of various techniques, histological and human radiological evidence.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):1840. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52144-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38246953 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources