Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Nov 22:2:66.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-66.

The measurement of health-related quality of life (QOL) in paediatric clinical trials: a systematic review

Sally-Ann Clarke  1 , Christine Eiser
Affiliations

The measurement of health-related quality of life (QOL) in paediatric clinical trials: a systematic review

Sally-Ann Clarke et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: The goal of much care in chronic childhood illness is to improve quality of life (QOL). However, surveys suggest QOL measures are not routinely included. In addition, there is little consensus about the quality of many QOL measures.

Objectives: To determine the extent to which quality of life (QOL) measures are used in paediatric clinical trials and evaluate the quality of measures used.

Design: Systematic literature review.

Review methods: Included paediatric trials published in English between 1994 and 2003 involving children and adolescents up to the age of 20 years, and use of a standardised QOL measure. Data Sources included MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMB Reviews, AMED, BNI, PSYCHINFO, the Cochrane library, Internet, and reference lists from review articles.

Results: We identified 18 trials including assessment of QOL (4 Asthma, 4 Rhinitis, 2 Dermatitis, and single studies of Eczema, Cystic fibrosis, Otis media, Amblyopia, Diabetes, Obesity associated with a brain tumour, Idiopathic short stature, and Congenital agranulocytosis). In three trials, parents rated their own QOL but not their child's. Fourteen different QOL measures were used but only two fulfilled our minimal defined criteria for quality.

Conclusions: This review confirms previous reports of limited use of QOL measures in paediatric clinical trials. Our review provides information about availability and quality of measures which will be of especial value to trial developers.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Newacheck PW, Strickland B, Shonkoff JP, Perrin JM, McPherson M, McManus M, Lauver C, Fox H, Arango P. An epidemiologic profile of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics. 1998;102:117–123. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.1.117. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stiller CA. Population based survival rates for childhood cancer in Britain, 1980–91. BMJ. 1994;309:1612–1616. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaffe A, Bush A. Cystic Fibrosis: review of the decade. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2001;56:240–247. - PubMed
    1. Eiser C, Morse R. Quality of life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–157. - PubMed
    1. Chassany O, Sagnier P, Marquis P, Fullerton S, Aaronson N, for the ERIQA group Patient-reported outcomes: the examples of health-related quality of life – A European guidance document for the improved integration of health-related quality of life assessment in the drug regulatory process. Drug Inf J. 2002;36:209–238.

Publication types