Similar articles

• [We wish more professional debate about the bibliometric research indicators].

  Søndergaard J, Mouritzen PE, Olesen SP, Molin S, Fink H, Blaabjerg F, Sivertsen G. Søndergaard J, et al. Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Mar 22;172(12):984; author reply 984. Ugeskr Laeger. 2010. PMID: 20376986 Danish. No abstract available.
• Peers review, editors decide, and then, what?

  Schachat AP. Schachat AP. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;143(4):677-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.01.023. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17386274 No abstract available.
• The positive and negative impacts, and dangers of the impact factor.

  Scully C. Scully C. Community Dent Health. 2007 Sep;24(3):130-4. Community Dent Health. 2007. PMID: 17958071
• New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation.

  Moed HF. Moed HF. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 Jan-Feb;57(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0001-5. Epub 2009 Feb 14. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009. PMID: 19219533 Review.
• The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.

  Jones AW. Jones AW. Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):115-28. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jun 19. Forensic Sci Int. 2007. PMID: 16784827 Review.