Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2004;31(3):306-8.

Composite graft endocarditis: repair with a mechanical prosthesis

Affiliations
Case Reports

Composite graft endocarditis: repair with a mechanical prosthesis

Anil Z Apaydin et al. Tex Heart Inst J. 2004.

Abstract

We report the case of a 64-year-old man who developed a mediastinal pseudoaneurysm due to severe endocarditis, 2 years after aortic root replacement with a prosthetic composite graft containing a mechanical valve. After a short period of stabilization and antibiotic therapy, the patient underwent surgery. The coronary buttons and the sewing ring of the composite graft were found to be detached from the graft and the annulus, respectively. Re-replacement with a prosthetic composite graft (Dacron graft with a mechanical valve) by the Cabrol procedure was performed. Although the homograft is considered by many surgeons to be the best graft for aortic root replacement, the synthetic composite graft can also be used to treat composite graft endocarditis successfully. The technical aspects of homograft versus synthetic aortic root replacement in patients with endocarditis are discussed briefly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Fig. 1 Drawing shows intraoperative appearance after entry into the pseudoaneurysmal cavity and clamping of the aorta. Both coronary buttons and part of the sewing ring were found to be detached from the graft.
None
Fig. 2 Drawing shows the anastomoses of the 8-mm Dacron graft, which was anastomosed end-to-end to the left coronary button, and then side-to-side to the composite graft.
None
Fig. 3 Postoperative aortogram shows a satisfactory repair.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Niwaya K, Knott-Craig CJ, Santangelo K, Lane MM, Chandrasekeran K, Elkins RC. Advantage of autograft and homograft valve replacement for complex aortic valve endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1603–8. - PubMed
    1. Haydock D, Barratt-Boyes B, Macedo T, Kirklin JW, Blackstone E. Aortic valve replacement for active infectious endocarditis in 108 patients. A comparison of freehand allograft valves with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103:130–9. - PubMed
    1. Lytle BW, Sabik JF, Blackstone EH, Svensson LG, Pettersson GB, Cosgrove DM 3rd. Reoperative cryopreserved root and ascending aorta replacement for acute aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:S1754–7; S1792–9. - PubMed
    1. Aagaard J, Andersen PV. Acute endocarditis treated with radical debridement and implantation of mechanical or stented bioprosthetic devices. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71: 100–4. - PubMed
    1. Bauernschmitt R, Jakob HG, Vahl CF, Lange R, Hagl S. Operation for infective endocarditis: results after implantation of mechanical valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:359–64. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances