Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Nov 24:5:182.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-182.

A new mixture model approach to analyzing allelic-loss data using Bayes factors

Affiliations

A new mixture model approach to analyzing allelic-loss data using Bayes factors

Manisha Desai et al. BMC Bioinformatics. .

Abstract

Background: Allelic-loss studies record data on the loss of genetic material in tumor tissue relative to normal tissue at various loci along the genome. As the deletion of a tumor suppressor gene can lead to tumor development, one objective of these studies is to determine which, if any, chromosome arms harbor tumor suppressor genes.

Results: We propose a large class of mixture models for describing the data, and we suggest using Bayes factors to select a reasonable model from the class in order to classify the chromosome arms. Bayes factors are especially useful in the case of testing that the number of components in a mixture model is n0 versus n1. In these cases, frequentist test statistics based on the likelihood ratio statistic have unknown distributions and are therefore not applicable. Our simulation study shows that Bayes factors favor the right model most of the time when tumor suppressor genes are present. When no tumor suppressor genes are present and background allelic-loss varies, the Bayes factors are often inconclusive, although this results in a markedly reduced false-positive rate compared to that of standard frequentist approaches. Application of our methods to three data sets of esophageal adenocarcinomas yields interesting differences from those results previously published.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that Bayes factors are useful for analyzing allelic-loss data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of allelic loss for the Barrett data set
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histogram of allelic loss for the Gleeson data set
Figure 3
Figure 3
Histogram of allelic loss for the Hammoud data set

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barrett MT, Galipeau PC, Sanchez CA, Emond MJ, Reid BJ. Determination of the frequency of loss of heterozygosity in esophageal adenocarcinoma by cell sorting, whole genome amplification and microsatellite polymorphisms. Oncogene. 1996;12:1873–1878. - PubMed
    1. Marshall CJ. Tumor suppressor genes. Cell. 1991;64:313–326. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90641-B. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dolan K, Garde J, Gosney J, Sissons M, Wright T, Kingsnorth A, Walker S, Sutton R, Meltzer S. Allelotype analysis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: loss of heterozygosity occurs at multiple sites. British Journal of Cancer. 1998;78:950–957. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hammoud ZT, Kaleem Z, Cooper JD, Sundaresan RS, Patterson GA, Goodfellow PJ. Allelotype analysis of esophageal adenocarcinomas: evidence for the involvement of sequences on the long arm of chromosome 4. Cancer Research. 1996;56:4499–4502. - PubMed
    1. Fearon ER. Tumor suppressor genes. The Genetic Basis of Human Cancer. 1998;7:145.

Publication types