Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Dec;78(24):13934-42.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.24.13934-13942.2004.

Comparison of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific T-cell responses in HIV-1- and HIV-2-infected individuals in Senegal

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific T-cell responses in HIV-1- and HIV-2-infected individuals in Senegal

N N Zheng et al. J Virol. 2004 Dec.

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection is typically less virulent than HIV-1 infection, which may permit the host to mount more effective, sustained T-cell immunity. We investigated antiviral gamma interferon-secreting T-cell responses by an ex vivo Elispot assay in 68 HIV-1- and 55 HIV-2-infected Senegalese patients to determine if differences relate to more efficient HIV-2 control. Homologous HIV-specific T cells were detected in similar frequencies (79% versus 76%, P = 0.7) and magnitude (3.12 versus 3.08 log(10) spot-forming cells/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells) in HIV-1 and HIV-2 infection, respectively. Gag-specific responses predominated in both groups (>/=64%), and significantly higher Nef-specific responses occurred in HIV-1-infected (54%) than HIV-2-infected patients (22%) (P < 0.001). Heterologous responses were more frequent in HIV-1 than in HIV-2 infection (46% versus 27%, P = 0.04), but the mean magnitude was similar. Total frequencies of HIV-specific responses in both groups did not correlate with plasma viral load and CD4(+) T-cell count in multivariate regression analyses. However, the magnitude of HIV-2 Gag-specific responses was significantly associated with lower plasma viremia in HIV-1-infected patients (P = 0.04). CD4(+) T-helper responses, primarily recognizing HIV-2 Gag, were detected in 48% of HIV-2-infected compared to only 8% of HIV-1-infected patients. These findings indicate that improved control of HIV-2 infection may relate to the contribution of T-helper cell responses. By contrast, the superior control of HIV-1 replication associated with HIV-2 Gag responses suggests that these may represent cross-reactive, higher-avidity T cells targeting epitopes within Gag regions of functional importance in HIV replication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
HIV IFN-γ Elispot response profile of PBMC from an HIV-2-infected patient. The bars depict the average number of IFN-γ spot-forming cells (SFC) per 106 PBMC. (A) Initial mapping of the HIV-specific T-cell responses with peptide pools spanning Gag, Env, Nef, and Tat of HIV-1 and HIV-2. For HIV-1, there are five Gag peptide pools (pool 1, peptides spanning amino acids 1 to 110; pool 2, 100 to 210; pool 3, 200 to 310; pool 4, 300 to 410; pool 5, 400 to 495); nine Env pools (pool 1, 1 to 110; pool 2, 100 to 210; pool 3, 200 to 310; pool 4, 300 to 410; pool 5, 400 to 510; pool 6, 500 to 610; pool 7, 600 to 710; pool 8, 700 to 810; pool 9, 800 to 861); two Tat pools (pool 1, 1 to 65; pool 2, 55 to 101), and four Nef pools (pool 1, 1 to 65; pool 2, 55 to 120; pool 3, 110 to 175; pool 4, 165 to 209). For HIV-2, there are five Gag pools (pool A, 1 to 110; pool B, 100 to 210; pool C, 200 to 310; pool D, 300 to 410; pool E, 400 to 522); nine Env pools (pool A, 1 to 110; pool B, 100 to 210; pool C, 200 to 310; pool D, 300 to 410, pool E, 400 to 510; pool F, 500 to 610; pool G, 600 to 710; pool H, 700 to 810; pool I, 800 to 858); two Tat pools (pool A, 1 to 75; pool B, 65 to 130), and four Nef pools (pool A, 1 to 65; pool B, 55 to 120; pool C, 110 to 175; pool D, 165 to 256). Phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated cells served as the positive control (not shown), and cells stimulated with no peptides served as the negative control. (B) Determination of the T-cell subset (CD4+ or CD4) responsible for IFN-γ secretion and recognition of the individual 20-mer peptides within HIV-2 Gag pool C.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Frequency and magnitude of T-cell responses to HIV peptides recognizing epitopes within Gag, Env, Nef, and Tat. (A) Frequency of homologous T-cell responses recognizing HIV Gag, Env, Nef, and Tat (i.e., responses to HIV-1 Gag, Env, Nef, and Tat in HIV-1-infected patients, and responses to HIV-2 Gag, Env, Nef, and Tat in HIV-2-infected patients). (B) Magnitude of homologous T-cell responses. (C) Frequency of cross-reactive T-cell responses to HIV Gag, Env, Nef, and Tat in HIV-1- and HIV-2-infected patients (i.e., responses to HIV-2 Gag, Env, Nef, and Tat in HIV-1-infected patients, and responses to HIV-1 Gag, Env, Nef, and Tat in HIV-2-infected patients). (D) Magnitude of cross-reactive T-cell responses to HIV Gag, Env, Nef, and Tat in HIV-1- and HV-2-infected patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addo, M. M., X. G. Yu, A. Rathod, D. Cohen, R. L. Eldridge, D. Strick, M. N. Johnston, C. Corcoran, A. G. Wurcel, C. A. Fitzpatrick, M. E. Feeney, W. R. Rodriguez, N. Basgoz, R. Draenert, D. R. Stone, C. Brander, P. J. Goulder, E. S. Rosenberg, M. Altfeld, and B. D. Walker. 2003. Comprehensive epitope analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific T-cell responses directed against the entire expressed HIV-1 genome demonstrate broadly directed responses, but no correlation to viral load. J. Virol. 77:2081-2092. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ariyoshi, K., F. Cham, N. Berry, S. Jaffar, S. Sabally, T. Corrah, and H. Whittle. 1995. HIV-2-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity is inversely related to proviral load. AIDS 9:555-559. - PubMed
    1. Bertoletti, A., F. Cham, S. McAdam, T. Rostron, S. Rowland-Jones, S. Sabally, T. Corrah, K. Ariyoshi, and H. Whittle. 1998. Cytotoxic T cells from human immunodeficiency virus type 2-infected patients frequently cross-react with different human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clades. J. Virol. 72:2439-2448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Betts, M. R., D. R. Ambrozak, D. C. Douek, S. Bonhoeffer, J. M. Brenchley, J. P. Casazza, R. A. Koup, and L. J. Picker. 2001. Analysis of total human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses: relationship to viral load in untreated HIV infection. J. Virol. 75:11983-11991. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borrow, P., H. Lewicki, B. H. Hahn, G. M. Shaw, and M. B. Oldstone. 1994. Virus-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity associated with control of viremia in primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol. 68:6103-6110. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types