Physician agreement with US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations
- PMID: 1556535
Physician agreement with US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations
Abstract
Background: No large-scale work has yet assessed the reactions of physicians to the report of the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), despite its potential for fostering a consensus among practitioners. This study undertook a survey of family physicians to assess their agreement with the recommendations of the Task Force.
Methods: A survey containing the verbatim summary recommendations of the USPSTF was mailed to all 1784 active members of the Ohio Academy of Family Physicians.
Results: No evidence of selection bias was found among the 898 responding physicians. The average physician agreed with 88% of the recommendations. For a number of recommendations, however, particularly those in which the Task Force differed with the American Cancer Society, there was a high level of disagreement. Physician disagreement with the recommendations was associated with older age, not having completed a residency, male sex, less prior exposure to the USPSTF guidelines, and greater perception of the impracticality of applying them.
Conclusions: The high level of agreement with most USPSTF recommendations implies that they represent an emerging consensus about which preventive services should be delivered. Attempts at USPSTF guideline dissemination should focus on recommendations with high agreement. Additional research is needed to assess the reasons for disagreement.
Similar articles
-
Family physicians' disagreements with the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.J Fam Pract. 1994 Aug;39(2):140-7. J Fam Pract. 1994. PMID: 8057064
-
How do family physicians prioritize delivery of multiple preventive services?J Fam Pract. 1994 Mar;38(3):231-7. J Fam Pract. 1994. PMID: 8126402
-
Cancer screening guideline preference surveys: physicians' perceptions of the American Cancer Society.Tenn Med. 1998 Jan;91(1):17-20. Tenn Med. 1998. PMID: 9439181 Clinical Trial.
-
Preventive services: the good, the bad, and the unproven.J Fam Pract. 2009 Jul;58(7):374-7. J Fam Pract. 2009. PMID: 19607776 Review.
-
Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the US Preventive Services Task Force.Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:511-38. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.002455. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996. PMID: 8724238 Review.
Cited by
-
Modern trabecular metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: What is the evidence? A systematic review.Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Feb;13(1):29-37. doi: 10.1177/1758573220914277. Epub 2020 Sep 25. Shoulder Elbow. 2021. PMID: 33717216 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Put prevention into practice: a controlled evaluation.Am J Public Health. 2000 Oct;90(10):1622-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.10.1622. Am J Public Health. 2000. PMID: 11030000 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple clinical practice guidelines for breast and cervical cancer screening: perceptions of US primary care physicians.Med Care. 2011 Feb;49(2):139-48. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318202858e. Med Care. 2011. PMID: 21206294 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of recommendations on hypertension: the Canadian Hypertension Education Program.Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):595-8. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70281-1. Can J Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16755314 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care.CMAJ. 2001 Mar 20;164(6):757-63. CMAJ. 2001. PMID: 11276541 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.