Physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery
- PMID: 15566340
- DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00320.x
Physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery
Abstract
Background: The issue about whether a woman's autonomy in childbirth should include the choice of cesarean delivery in the absence of medical indications has become a major source of debate. Our objective was to examine factors that determined physicians' responses to patient-requested cesarean delivery.
Methods: Surveys were distributed to all obstetrician-gynecologists in the greater Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area in Spring, 2000. Physicians were asked to respond to scenarios involving a term patient with a singleton pregnancy requesting primary cesarean delivery.
Results: One hundred and seventy of 255 physicians (67%) responded, of whom 68 to 98 percent agreed to cesarean delivery in cases with clear medical indications. Without a clear medical indication, most practitioners would not perform a cesarean delivery. In cases where medical indications were unclear, responses were divided. Physician male gender and patient high socioeconomic status were associated with increased likelihood of physician agreement to patient-requested cesarean delivery. Age, years in practice, and practice type were not associated with agreement.
Conclusions: Physicians are reluctant to agree to patient request for primary cesarean delivery without a clear medical indication. Male physicians were more likely to agree to a patient's request for cesarean delivery than female physicians.
Similar articles
-
Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.Birth. 2005 Sep;32(3):203-6. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00370.x. Birth. 2005. PMID: 16128974
-
Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1137-41. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128118.37737.df. Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15172844
-
Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):57-66. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249608.11864.b6. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17197588
-
Patient choice cesarean delivery: ethical issues.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;20(2):116-9. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282f55df7. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18388809 Review.
-
Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;103(2):387-92. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000107288.44622.2a. Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 14754712 Review.
Cited by
-
Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16(3):725-34. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0769-x. Matern Child Health J. 2012. PMID: 21400201
-
Physician-patient communication in decision-making about Caesarean sections in eight district hospitals in Bangladesh: a mixed-method study.Reprod Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01098-8. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 33563303 Free PMC article.
-
Scheduled cesarean delivery: maternal and neonatal risks in primiparous women in a community hospital setting.Am J Perinatol. 2009 Apr;26(4):271-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103155. Epub 2008 Nov 19. Am J Perinatol. 2009. PMID: 19021093 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in private and public health facilities in underserved South Asian communities: cross-sectional analysis of data from Bangladesh, India and Nepal.BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 30;4(12):e005982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005982. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25550293 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical