High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality?
- PMID: 15569369
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2004.00431.x
High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality?
Abstract
Aimed at reducing surgical deaths, several initiatives have attempted to establish volume-based referral strategies in high risk surgery. The detailed analysis of the literature of the last 10 years, comprising 13 papers on esophageal cancer, shows a clear reduction in postoperative mortality with increasing case volumes per year. Single papers have analyzed the main reasons for this phenomenon and showed that postoperative complication rates are lower in high-volume hospitals and management of complications is more successful. Further, long-term prognosis is also correlated to case-volume. In conclusion, the analysis shows that only with the experience of more than 20 esophagectomies per year can a significant reduction of the mortality, down to 4.9%, be achieved. Based on this survey, surgery of esophageal cancer is a task for high-volume hospitals because of decreased postoperative mortality and improved long-term prognosis compared with low volume hospitals.
Similar articles
-
High-volume centers--effect of case load on outcome in cancer surgery.Onkologie. 2004 Aug;27(4):412-6. doi: 10.1159/000079099. Onkologie. 2004. PMID: 15347901 Review.
-
A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):450-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1b11d. Ann Surg. 2013. PMID: 24022437
-
The volume-performance relationship in esophagectomy.Thorac Surg Clin. 2006 Feb;16(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2006.01.008. Thorac Surg Clin. 2006. PMID: 16696286 Review.
-
Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jun;119(6):1126-32. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2000.105644. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000. PMID: 10838528
-
Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals.Dis Esophagus. 2010 Feb;23(2):145-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00986.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9. Dis Esophagus. 2010. PMID: 19515188
Cited by
-
[New S3 guideline for esophageal cancer : Important surgical aspects].Chirurg. 2016 Oct;87(10):865-72. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0214-1. Chirurg. 2016. PMID: 27406251 German.
-
Outcome, complications, and mortality of an intrathoracic anastomosis in esophageal cancer in patients without a preoperative selection with a risk score.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jan;400(1):9-18. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1257-8. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. PMID: 25408482
-
Patient Selection for Oesophagectomy: Impact of Age and Comorbidities on Outcome.World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):1994-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3072-y. World J Surg. 2015. PMID: 25877735
-
Esophagectomy--it's not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1395-402; discussion 1402. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0265-1. Epub 2007 Aug 31. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007. PMID: 17763917
-
Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Management of Gastric Tube Cancers After Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2023 Jun 16;15(6):e40526. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40526. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37461759 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical