Face perception: domain specific, not process specific
- PMID: 15572118
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.018
Face perception: domain specific, not process specific
Abstract
Evidence that face perception is mediated by special cognitive and neural mechanisms comes from fMRI studies of the fusiform face area (FFA) and behavioral studies of the face inversion effect. Here, we used these two methods to ask whether face perception mechanisms are stimulus specific, process specific, or both. Subjects discriminated pairs of upright or inverted faces or house stimuli that differed in either the spatial distance among parts (configuration) or the shape of the parts. The FFA showed a much higher response to faces than to houses, but no preference for the configuration task over the part task. Similarly, the behavioral inversion effect was as large in the part task as the configuration task for faces, but absent in both part and configuration tasks for houses. These findings indicate that face perception mechanisms are not process specific for parts or configuration but are domain specific for face stimuli per se.
Comment in
-
No about face on houses in the fusiform face area!Neuron. 2004 Dec 2;44(5):747-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.020. Neuron. 2004. PMID: 15572106
Similar articles
-
No about face on houses in the fusiform face area!Neuron. 2004 Dec 2;44(5):747-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.020. Neuron. 2004. PMID: 15572106
-
The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect.Curr Biol. 2005 Dec 20;15(24):2256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.072. Curr Biol. 2005. PMID: 16360687
-
Cortical correlates of face and scene inversion: a comparison.Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1145-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.009. Epub 2005 Nov 21. Neuropsychologia. 2006. PMID: 16303149
-
Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging.Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 7;45(1):174-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Jul 18. Neuropsychologia. 2007. PMID: 16854439 Review.
-
Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jan;11(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 28. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007. PMID: 17129746 Review.
Cited by
-
Dissociating Attention Effects from Categorical Perception with ERP Functional Microstates.PLoS One. 2016 Sep 22;11(9):e0163336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163336. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27657921 Free PMC article.
-
Configural processing of biological motion in human superior temporal sulcus.J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 28;25(39):9059-66. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2129-05.2005. J Neurosci. 2005. PMID: 16192397 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced striatal and prefrontal activity is associated with individual differences in nonreinforced preference change for faces.Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Mar;41(4):1043-1060. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24859. Epub 2019 Nov 15. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020. PMID: 31729115 Free PMC article.
-
Body inversion effect in monkeys.PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204353. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30303982 Free PMC article.
-
Orientation-invariance of individual differences in three face processing tasks.R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jan 9;6(1):181350. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181350. eCollection 2019 Jan. R Soc Open Sci. 2019. PMID: 30800380 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources