Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Dec;13(6):461-6.
doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.6.461.

Models of the medical consultation: opportunities and limitations of a game theory perspective

Affiliations

Models of the medical consultation: opportunities and limitations of a game theory perspective

C Tarrant et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Dec.

Abstract

The medical consultation is best understood as a two-way social interaction involving interactive decision making. Game theory--a theory based on assumptions of rational choice and focusing on interactive decision making--has the potential to provide models of the consultation that can be used to generate empirically testable predictions about the factors that promote quality of care. Three different game structures--the Prisoner's Dilemma game, the Assurance game, and the Centipede game--all provide insights into the possible underlying dynamics of the doctor-patient interaction. Further empirical work is needed to uncover the underlying game structures that occur most commonly in medical consultations. Game theory has the potential to provide a new conceptual and theoretical basis for future empirical work on the interaction between doctors and their patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • The consultation game.
    Elwyn G. Elwyn G. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Dec;13(6):415-6. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.6.415. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004. PMID: 15576701 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Behav Brain Sci. 2003 Apr;26(2):139-53; discussion 153-98 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):477-82 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Mar;50(6):829-40 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40 - PubMed
    1. J R Soc Med. 2003 Apr;96(4):160-6 - PubMed

Publication types