Dealing with editorial misconduct

Editorial

Fiona Godlee. BMJ. 2004.

. 2004 Dec 4;329(7478):1301-2.

doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1301.

No abstract available

Comment in

Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors?
Laube RE. Laube RE. BMJ. 2005 Feb 12;330(7487):364. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7487.364-b. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15705711 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about spin?
Bates CD. Bates CD. BMJ. 2005 Feb 12;330(7487):364. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7487.364-a. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15705712 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

1. Rennie D. Misconduct and journal peer review. In Godlee F, Jefferson T, eds. Peer review in health sciences. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books, 2003.
1. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. www.icmje.org/icmje.pdf (accessed 22 Nov 2004). - PubMed
1. The responsibilities of medical editors: a statement by the World Association of Medical Editors. www.wame.org/wamestmt.htm#responsibilities (accessed 22 Nov 2004).
1. Smith R. Misconduct in research: editors respond. BMJ 1997;315: 201-2. - PMC - PubMed
1. Rennie D. An American perspective on research integrity. BMJ 1998;316: 1726-8. - PMC - PubMed