First-line efavirenz versus lopinavir-ritonavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy for naive patients

Abstract

Ninety-seven consecutive patients started anti-HIV therapy based on efavirenz (46) or lopinavir-ritonavir (51) in an observational study. Despite the significantly more compromised immunological-clinical baseline conditions of patients starting lopinavir-ritonavir, a mean clinical-laboratory follow-up of 17 months showed a comparable laboratory response and therapy interruption or change rate, although the toxicity profile of the two compounds proved significantly different. Randomized studies comparing these two recommended first-line treatments are warranted, particularly from a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint.