Doing new research? Don't forget the old
- PMID: 15578106
- PMCID: PMC529424
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010035
Doing new research? Don't forget the old
Abstract
Nobody should do a new research study, says Clarke, without first systematically reviewing the literature. And journal editors should insist that all research papers are accompanied by an up-to-date systematic review
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The author's employment depends upon the value and importance given to systematic reviews. He is employed by the Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust on behalf of the Department of Health in England, as director of the UK Cochrane Centre for four days per week. This is a fixed term contract, the renewal of which is dependent upon the value placed upon his work, that of the UK Cochrane Centre (and more widely, of The Cochrane Collaboration) by the Department of Health, all of which relates to the importance of systematic reviews. He is also employed by Cancer Research UK to work one day per week at the Clinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom, primarily on systematic reviews of treatments for early breast cancer.
Figures
Comment in
-
From registration to publication.PLoS Med. 2004 Nov;1(2):e46. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010046. Epub 2004 Nov 30. PLoS Med. 2004. PMID: 15578113 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lord Rayleigh. Report of the fifty-fourth meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science; held at Montreal in August and September 1884. London: John Murray; 1885. Address by the Rt. Hon. Lord Rayleigh; pp. 3–23.
-
- Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637–639. - PubMed
-
- Clarke M, Chalmers I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in five general medical journals: Islands in search of continents? JAMA. 1998;280:280–282. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
