Regulatory and ethical principles in research involving children and individuals with developmental disabilities
- PMID: 15580725
- PMCID: PMC3124381
- DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb1401_3
Regulatory and ethical principles in research involving children and individuals with developmental disabilities
Abstract
Children and individuals with developmental disabilities (DD) compared to typical participants are disadvantaged not only by virtue of being vulnerable to risks inherent in research participation but also by the higher likelihood of exclusion from research altogether. Current regulatory and ethical guidelines although necessary for their protection do not sufficiently ensure fair distributive justice. Yet, in view of disproportionately higher burdens of co-occurring physical and mental disorders in individuals with DD, they are better positioned to benefit from research by equitable participation. Greater elucidation of this ethical dilemma is called for by researchers, institutional review boards, and funding agencies to urgently redress the imbalance. This article discusses many of the regulatory principles to ensure better research participation of children and individuals with DD: human rights, validity, distributive justice, beneficence/nonmaleficence, and autonomy.
Similar articles
-
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13. J Am Coll Dent. 2014. PMID: 25951677
-
Ethical standards for human subject research in developing countries.IRB. 1992 May-Jun;14(3):7-8. IRB. 1992. PMID: 11656138 No abstract available.
-
Justice as equitable power relations: beyond the "standard of care" debate and the Declaration of Helsinki.Am J Bioeth. 2003 Spring;3(2):W12. doi: 10.1162/152651603322781639. Am J Bioeth. 2003. PMID: 14635633 No abstract available.
-
International research: ethical imperialism or ethical pluralism?Account Res. 1999;7(1):59-83. doi: 10.1080/08989629908573942. Account Res. 1999. PMID: 11657563 Review. No abstract available.
-
[Clinical trials in developing countries: who should define ethics?].Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2008 Apr;101(2):102-5. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2008. PMID: 18543701 Review. French.
Cited by
-
The main indicators for Iranian hospital ethical accreditation.J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2015 Jul;3(3):117-32. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2015. PMID: 26269789 Free PMC article.
-
Protocol for a cohort study of adolescent mental health service users with a nested cluster randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of managed transition in improving transitions from child to adult mental health services (the MILESTONE study).BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 16;7(10):e016055. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016055. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29042376 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review.Hum Genomics. 2021 Mar 12;15(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4. Hum Genomics. 2021. PMID: 33712057 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Parent ratings of ability to consent for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Jul;9(3):18-28. doi: 10.1177/1556264614540591. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014. PMID: 25422596 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent of Transition age Children to Adolescents in Human Subject Research.J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2024 Feb;19(1-2):28-36. doi: 10.1177/15562646231219384. Epub 2023 Dec 10. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2024. PMID: 38073174 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy statements: Guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric populations (RE9503) Elk Grove Village, IL: Author; 1995.
-
- Angell M. Ethical imperialism? Ethics in international collaborative clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine. 1988;319:1081–1083. - PubMed
-
- Angell M. The ethics of clinical research in the third world. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997;337:847–849. - PubMed
-
- Angell M. Editorial responsibility: Protecting human rights by restricting publication of unethical research. In: Annas GJ, Grodin MA, editors. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 276–285.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical