Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Nov-Dec;35(6):485-93.

Retinal thickness in normal and RCD1 dogs using optical coherence tomography

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15580972
Comparative Study

Retinal thickness in normal and RCD1 dogs using optical coherence tomography

Carla Q Panzan et al. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2004 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background and objective: To compare retinal thickness and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness values obtained by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in normal dogs and dogs with rod-cone dysplasia type 1 (RCD1).

Materials and methods: Eight eyes of 6 normal hound-bred dogs and 12 eyes of 6 dogs with RCD1, 2 to 5 years of age, were examined using the Fast RNFL Thickness, Fast Macular Thickness, and line scan protocols of OCT.

Results: Retinal thickness was significantly higher in the tapetal fundus than in the non-tapetal fundus, in both normal (P = .0036) and RCD1 (P < .0001) dogs. Superotemporal, superonasal, and inferior retinal thickness values were significantly higher in normal dogs (P < .0001). Area centralis thickness was 183.5 +/- 10.66 microm in normal dogs and 136.16 +/- 13.12 microm in RCD1 dogs (P < .0001). There was no difference in RNFL thickness between normal and RCD1 dogs (P > .05).

Conclusion: OCT scanning in dogs is considered to be a useful method of evaluation in future retinal studies in this animal model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources