Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004:64 Suppl 1:1-5.
doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464001-00002.

Current options in the prevention of thromboembolic disease

Affiliations
Review

Current options in the prevention of thromboembolic disease

Jack Ansell et al. Drugs. 2004.

Abstract

Significant advances in the pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism have occurred since warfarin and unfractionated heparin were introduced for this indication nearly 60 years ago. Despite these advances, coumarin derivatives such as warfarin remain the only orally active anticoagulants available for prophylaxis in venous thromboembolism. Although administered orally, coumarin derivatives are not convenient to use, because they have narrow therapeutic indexes and require routine coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment. This is inconvenient for patients and physicians and costly for the healthcare system. Low-molecular-weight heparins, which are administered in fixed or weight-adjusted doses and do not require monitoring, are widely used for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients in both the hospital and the outpatient setting. However, these drugs must be given subcutaneously, which can be difficult for outpatients and resource-intensive for in-hospital use. Likewise, fondaparinux, the synthetic pentasaccharide, must be administered subcutaneously. Consequently, there remains a need for new orally active anticoagulants that can be given in fixed doses and do not have a narrow therapeutic index, so that coagulation monitoring is unnecessary. Because such agents would be more convenient for patients and physicians, they would probably expand the use of prophylaxis in venous thromboembolism in those at risk, and would simplify treatment of patients with established venous thromboembolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Drugs. 2002;62(5):841-70 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1 Suppl):22S-38S - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1976 Apr;53(4):691-5 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23 Suppl 1):I9-16 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1991 Jul;78(7):849-52 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources