Fertilization of IVF/ICSI using sibling oocytes from couples with subfertile male or unexplained infertility
- PMID: 15587400
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02861869
Fertilization of IVF/ICSI using sibling oocytes from couples with subfertile male or unexplained infertility
Abstract
The significance of the performance of conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) using sibling oocytes from couples with subfertile male or unexplained infertility was evaluated. A total of 410 sibling oocyte cumulus-corona complexes (OCCC) from 21 couples with subfertile male (group A) and 11 unexplained infertile couples (group B) were randomly divided, in order of retrieval, into two groups inseminated either by conventional IVF or by ICSI. The treatment outcomes and the influence of infertility factors on fertilization in each group were compared. The results showed that although the two pronuclear (2PN) fertilization rate per injected sibling oocytes was significantly higher after ICSI (group A: 68.2% +/- 28.8%; group B: 66.2% +/- 24.9%) than after conventional IVF (group A: 41.8% +/- 32.7%; group B: 40.1% +/- 22.1%), the other variables studied included: the fertilization rates of per allocated sibling oocytes IVF/ICSI, the fertilization rates of sibling oocytes IVF/ICSI after excluding failed IVF fertilization cycles, as well as the cleavage rates of normal fertilization were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Similarly, though the total fertilization failure rate in the IVF group (group A: 42.9%; group B: 36.4%) was significantly higher than in the ICSI group (group A: 4.8%; group B: 0), we did not cancel cycles due to the normal fertilization of sibling oocytes. Embryo transfer was possible in all 32 couples. There were 10 clinical pregnancies in the two groups. We also discovered a possible association between some semen parameters and sperm functions of group A, and women age and duration of infertility of group B and fertilization. It is suggested that adoption of the split IVF/ICSI technology in the above cases may help eliminate fertilization failures. This is also a useful method to investigate the effect of single factor on the employment of assisted reproductive technology.
Similar articles
-
In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split: an insemination method to prevent fertilization failure.Fertil Steril. 2002 Feb;77(2):229-32. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02978-8. Fertil Steril. 2002. PMID: 11821076 Clinical Trial.
-
Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with borderline semen: a randomized study using sibling oocytes.Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.077. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID: 16595217 Clinical Trial.
-
Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen.Hum Reprod. 1999 Oct;14(10):2474-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2474. Hum Reprod. 1999. PMID: 10527972 Clinical Trial.
-
[Twenty years of in vitro fertilization: realization and questions for the future].Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001;63(3):193-240; discussion 240-1. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001. PMID: 11499344 Review. Dutch.
-
Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates.Fertil Steril. 2008 Aug;90(2):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Sep 27. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17904130 Review.
Cited by
-
ICSI treatment of severe male infertility can achieve prospective embryo quality compared with IVF of fertile donor sperm on sibling oocytes.Asian J Androl. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(5):845-9. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.146971. Asian J Androl. 2015. PMID: 25652630 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with non-male factor infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Reprod Health. 2022 Oct 28;4:1029381. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.1029381. eCollection 2022. Front Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 36388149 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2(2):CD000360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000360.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 26915339 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical