Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues
- PMID: 15595895
- DOI: 10.1167/4.10.7
Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues
Abstract
We investigate how different depth cues are combined when one cue is ambiguous. Convex and concave surfaces produce similar texture projections at large viewing distances. Our study considered unambiguous disparity information and its combination with ambiguous texture information. Specifically, we asked whether disparity and texture were processed separately, before linear combination of shape estimates, or jointly, such that disparity disambiguated the texture information. Vertical ridges of various depths were presented stereoscopically. Their texture was consistent (in terms of maximum likelihood) with both a convex and a concave ridge. Disparity was consistent with either a convex or concave ridge. In a separate experiment the stimuli were defined solely by texture (monocular viewing). Under monocular viewing observers consistently reported the convex interpretation of the texture cue. However, in stereoscopic stimuli, texture information modulated shape from disparity in a way inconsistent with simple linear combination. When disparity indicated a concave surface, a texture pattern perceived as highly convex when viewed monocularly caused the stimulus to appear more concave than a "flat" texture pattern. Our data confirm that different cues can disambiguate each other. Data from both experiments are well modeled by a Bayesian approach incorporating a prior for convexity.
Similar articles
-
Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination.J Vis. 2004 Dec 1;4(12):967-92. doi: 10.1167/4.12.1. J Vis. 2004. PMID: 15669906
-
Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.J Vis. 2010 Jun 1;10(6):11. doi: 10.1167/10.6.11. J Vis. 2010. PMID: 20884560
-
The role of stereopsis, motion parallax, perspective and angle polarity in perceiving 3-D shape.Seeing Perceiving. 2012;25(3-4):263-85. doi: 10.1163/187847511X576802. Epub 2011 Jul 19. Seeing Perceiving. 2012. PMID: 21771395
-
Configuration stereopsis: a new look at the depth-disparity relation.Spat Vis. 2009;22(1):91-103. doi: 10.1163/156856809786618493. Spat Vis. 2009. PMID: 19055889 Review.
-
BINOCULAR DEPTH PERCEPTION WITHOUT FAMILIARITY CUES.Science. 1964 Jul 24;145(3630):356-62. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3630.356. Science. 1964. PMID: 14172596 Review.
Cited by
-
The Development of Audio-Visual Integration for Temporal Judgements.PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 14;12(4):e1004865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004865. eCollection 2016 Apr. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016. PMID: 27078834 Free PMC article.
-
Competition between newly recruited and pre-existing visual cues during the construction of visual appearance.Vision Res. 2007 Mar;47(7):919-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.008. Epub 2007 Feb 15. Vision Res. 2007. PMID: 17303207 Free PMC article.
-
Bayesian Models of Individual Differences.Psychol Sci. 2016 Dec;27(12):1562-1572. doi: 10.1177/0956797616665351. Epub 2016 Oct 23. Psychol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27770059 Free PMC article.
-
Disruptive coloration and binocular disparity: breaking camouflage.Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 13;286(1896):20182045. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2045. Proc Biol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30963917 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of specular highlights on perceived surface convexity.PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 May 8;10(5):e1003576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003576. eCollection 2014 May. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014. PMID: 24811069 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources