Intake, ingesta retention, particle size distribution and digestibility in the hippopotamidae
- PMID: 15596390
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.10.002
Intake, ingesta retention, particle size distribution and digestibility in the hippopotamidae
Abstract
Although several aspects of the digestive physiology of the hippopotamidae-non-ruminating foregut fermenters-have been described, ingesta kinetics and passage characteristics of these species are not well understood. The most outstanding feature of the hippo digestive physiology reported so far is the very long mean ingesta retention times (MRTs) measured by Foose [Foose, T., 1982. Trophic strategies of ruminant versus nonruminant ungulates. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.]. Since those data had been investigated with animals without water access, we intended to measure MRT in hippos which were allowed to enter water pools during the night. MRT parameters as well as dry matter (DM) digestibility were determined in four common (Hippopotamus amphibius) and four pygmy hippos (Hexaprotodon liberiensis) on two different diets each using cobalt ethylendiamintetraacetate (Co-EDTA) as a fluid, chromium (Cr)-mordanted fibre (<2 mm) as a particle and acid detergent lignin (ADL) as an internal digestibility marker. Four of the animals additionally received cerium (Ce)-mordanted fibres (2-10 mm) as particle markers. Total MRTs for fluids and particles ranged between 20-35 and 48-106 h in the common and between 13-39 and 32-107 h in the pygmy hippos. The difference between fluid and particle retention was greater than usually reported in ruminants. Excretion patterns of the markers differed from those usually observed in ruminants but resembled those reported for macropods (kangaroos), indicating a plug-flow reactor-like physiology in the hippo forestomach (FRST). This finding complements other described similarities between the macropod and the hippo forestomach. The measurements of larger particle retention profiles suggest that in the hippo, larger particles might be excreted either faster or at the same rate as smaller particles, indicating a general difference between ruminants and hippos with respect to differential particle retention. The digestive physiology of hippos is characterised by a generally low food intake, long ingesta retention times and dry matter digestibilities lower than reported in ruminants. Moderate digestibilities in spite of long retention times might be the result of the generally high average ingesta particle size in hippos. The comparatively easy management of pygmy hippos, together with the significant correlations between food intake, MRT and digestibility in the pygmy hippos of this study, recommends this species for further studies on the interplay of these parameters in herbivore digestive physiology.
Similar articles
-
Excretion patterns of fluid and different sized particle passage markers in banteng (Bos javanicus) and pygmy hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon liberiensis): two functionally different foregut fermenters.Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2008 May;150(1):32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.02.022. Epub 2008 Feb 29. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2008. PMID: 18378479
-
More efficient mastication allows increasing intake without compromising digestibility or necessitating a larger gut: comparative feeding trials in banteng (Bos javanicus) and pygmy hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon liberiensis).Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2009 Apr;152(4):504-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.12.006. Epub 2008 Dec 24. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2009. PMID: 19135544
-
Digestion studies in captive Hippopotamidae: a group of large ungulates with an unusually low metabolic rate.J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2006 Aug;90(7-8):300-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2005.00599.x. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2006. PMID: 16867075
-
A case of non-scaling in mammalian physiology? Body size, digestive capacity, food intake, and ingesta passage in mammalian herbivores.Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2007 Oct;148(2):249-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.05.024. Epub 2007 Jun 7. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2007. PMID: 17643330 Review.
-
Potential impact of nutritional strategy on noninvasive measurements of hormones in birds.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Jun;1046:5-16. doi: 10.1196/annals.1343.003. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005. PMID: 16055840 Review.
Cited by
-
Digesta retention patterns of solute and different-sized particles in camelids compared with ruminants and other foregut fermenters.J Comp Physiol B. 2015 Jul;185(5):559-73. doi: 10.1007/s00360-015-0904-x. Epub 2015 Apr 29. J Comp Physiol B. 2015. PMID: 25921796
-
Chewing, dentition and tooth wear in Hippopotamidae (Hippopotamus amphibius and Choeropsis liberiensis).PLoS One. 2023 Oct 4;18(10):e0291825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291825. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37792716 Free PMC article.
-
No size-dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses.J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2022 Nov;106(6):1356-1363. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13757. Epub 2022 Jul 27. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2022. PMID: 35894118 Free PMC article.
-
Teeth and the gastrointestinal tract in mammals: when 1 + 1 = 3.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Dec 4;378(1891):20220544. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0544. Epub 2023 Oct 16. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37839451 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources