Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants
- PMID: 15596462
- PMCID: PMC4246713
- DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci008
Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants
Abstract
Background and aims: Plant nuclear genomes vary tremendously in DNA content, mostly due to differences in ancestral ploidy and variation in the degree of transposon amplification. These processes can increase genome size, but little is known about mechanisms of genome shrinkage and the degree to which these can attenuate or reverse genome expansion. This research focuses on characterizing DNA removal from the rice and Arabidopsis genomes, and discusses whether loss of DNA has effectively competed with amplification in these species.
Methods: Retrotransposons were analyzed for sequence variation within several element families in rice and Arabidopsis. Nucleotide sequence changes in the two termini of individual retrotransposons were used to date their time of insertion.
Key results: An accumulation of small deletions was found in both species, caused by unequal homologous recombination and illegitimate recombination. The relative contribution of unequal homologous recombination compared to illegitimate recombination was higher in rice than in Arabidopsis. However, retrotransposons are rapidly removed in both species, as evidenced by the similar apparent ages of intact elements (most less than 3 million years old) in these two plants and all other investigated plant species.
Conclusions: Differences in the activity of mechanisms for retrotransposon regulation or deletion generation between species could explain current genome size variation without any requirement for natural selection to act on this trait, although the results do not preclude selection as a contributing factor. The simplest model suggests that significant genome size variation is generated by lineage-specific differences in the molecular mechanisms of DNA amplification and removal, creating major variation in nuclear DNA content that can then serve as the substrate for fitness-based selection.
Figures

Similar articles
-
LTR retrotransposons in rice (Oryza sativa, L.): recent burst amplifications followed by rapid DNA loss.BMC Genomics. 2007 Jul 6;8:218. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-218. BMC Genomics. 2007. PMID: 17617907 Free PMC article.
-
Do genetic recombination and gene density shape the pattern of DNA elimination in rice long terminal repeat retrotransposons?Genome Res. 2009 Dec;19(12):2221-30. doi: 10.1101/gr.083899.108. Epub 2009 Sep 29. Genome Res. 2009. PMID: 19789376 Free PMC article.
-
Replication of nonautonomous retroelements in soybean appears to be both recent and common.Plant Physiol. 2008 Dec;148(4):1760-71. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.127910. Epub 2008 Oct 24. Plant Physiol. 2008. PMID: 18952860 Free PMC article.
-
LTR retrotransposons and flowering plant genome size: emergence of the increase/decrease model.Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):91-107. doi: 10.1159/000084941. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005. PMID: 16093661 Review.
-
Retrotransposons represent the most labile fraction for genomic rearrangements in polyploid plant species.Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013;140(2-4):286-94. doi: 10.1159/000353308. Epub 2013 Jul 9. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013. PMID: 23899810 Review.
Cited by
-
Relationship between fruit phenotypes and domestication in hexaploid populations of biribá (Annona mucosa) in Brazilian Amazonia.PeerJ. 2023 Jan 23;11:e14659. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14659. eCollection 2023. PeerJ. 2023. PMID: 36710859 Free PMC article.
-
Distribution, diversity, evolution, and survival of Helitrons in the maize genome.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 24;106(47):19922-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908008106. Epub 2009 Nov 19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009. PMID: 19926865 Free PMC article.
-
A miniature inverted-repeat transposable element, AddIn-MITE, located inside a WD40 gene is conserved in Andropogoneae grasses.PeerJ. 2019 Jan 11;7:e6080. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6080. eCollection 2019. PeerJ. 2019. PMID: 30648010 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid recent growth and divergence of rice nuclear genomes.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 24;101(34):12404-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403715101. Epub 2004 Jul 7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004. PMID: 15240870 Free PMC article.
-
In the name of the rose: a roadmap for rose research in the genome era.Hortic Res. 2019 May 3;6:65. doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0156-0. eCollection 2019. Hortic Res. 2019. PMID: 31069087 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bennett MD. 1972. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences 181: 109–135. - PubMed
-
- Bennetzen JL. 1996. The contributions of retroelements to plant genome organization, function and evolution. Trends in Microbiology 4: 347–353. - PubMed
-
- Bennetzen JL. 2002. Opening the door to comparative plant biology. Science 296: 60–63. - PubMed