Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Jan;59(1):15-22.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.019471.

Environmental risks in the developing world: exposure indicators for evaluating interventions, programmes, and policies

Affiliations
Review

Environmental risks in the developing world: exposure indicators for evaluating interventions, programmes, and policies

Majid Ezzati et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Monitoring and empirical evaluation are essential components of evidence based public health policies and programmes. Consequently, there is a growing interest in monitoring of, and indicators for, major environmental health risks, particularly in the developing world. Current large scale data collection efforts are generally disconnected from micro-scale studies in health sciences, which in turn have insufficiently investigated the behavioural and socioeconomic factors that influence exposure.

Study design: A basic framework is proposed for development of indicators of exposure to environmental health risks that would facilitate the (a) assessment of the health effects of risk factors, (b) design and evaluation of interventions and programmes to deliver the interventions, and (c) appraisal and quantification of inequalities in health effects of risk factors, and benefits of intervention programmes and policies. Specific emphasis is put on the features of environmental risks that should guide the choice of indicators, in particular the interactions of technology, the environment, and human behaviour in determining exposure. The indicators are divided into four categories: (a) access and infrastructure, (b) technology, (c) agents and vectors, and (d) behaviour. The study used water and sanitation, indoor air pollution from solid fuels, urban ambient air pollution, and malaria as illustrative examples for this framework.

Conclusions: Organised and systematic indicator selection and monitoring can provide an evidence base for design and implementation of more effective and equitable technological interventions, delivery programmes, and policies for environmental health risks in resource poor settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 2002 Oct 19;360(9341):1203-9 - PubMed
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1985;63(1):11-26 - PubMed
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Nov;110(11):1069-75 - PubMed
    1. Popul Health Metr. 2003 Apr 14;1(1):1 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1249-53 - PubMed

Publication types