The relative risks of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product compared with smoking cigarettes: estimates of a panel of experts
- PMID: 15598758
The relative risks of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product compared with smoking cigarettes: estimates of a panel of experts
Abstract
A nine-membered panel of experts was asked to determine expert opinions of mortality risks associated with use of low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco (LN-SLT) marketed for oral use. A modified Delphi approach was employed. For total mortality, the estimated median relative risks for individual users of LN-SLT were 9% and 5% of the risk associated with smoking for those ages 35 to 49 and > or =50 years, respectively. Median mortality risks relative to smoking were estimated to be 2% to 3% for lung cancer, 10% for heart disease, and 15% to 30% for oral cancer. Although individual estimates often varied between 0% and 50%, most panel members were confident or very confident of their estimates by the last round of consultation. In comparison with smoking, experts perceive at least a 90% reduction in the relative risk of LN-SLT use. The risks of using LN-SLT products therefore should not be portrayed as comparable with those of smoking cigarettes as has been the practice of some governmental and public health authorities in the past. Importantly, the overall public health impact of LN-SLT will reflect use patterns, its marketing, and governmental regulation of tobacco products.
Similar articles
-
The potential impact of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product on cigarette smoking in the United States: estimates of a panel of experts.Addict Behav. 2006 Jul;31(7):1190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.09.010. Epub 2005 Oct 26. Addict Behav. 2006. PMID: 16256276
-
Tobacco control policies and the concurrent use of smokeless tobacco and cigarettes among men, 1992-2002.Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Dec;7(6):891-900. doi: 10.1080/14622200500266098. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005. PMID: 16298724
-
Effect of smokeless tobacco product marketing and use on population harm from tobacco use policy perspective for tobacco-risk reduction.Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6 Suppl):S379-86. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.015. Am J Prev Med. 2007. PMID: 18021913 Review.
-
Snuffing out cigarette sales and the smoking deaths epidemic.N Z Med J. 2007 Jun 15;120(1256):U2587. N Z Med J. 2007. PMID: 17589555 Review.
-
Smokeless tobacco: a gateway to smoking or a way away from smoking.Biomarkers. 2009 Jul;14 Suppl 1:85-9. doi: 10.1080/13547500902965401. Biomarkers. 2009. PMID: 19604066 Review.
Cited by
-
Snus use, smoking and survival among prostate cancer patients.Int J Cancer. 2016 Dec 15;139(12):2753-2759. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30411. Int J Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27582277 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a Fact Sheet on beliefs about the harmfulness of alternative nicotine delivery systems compared with cigarettes.Harm Reduct J. 2012 Jun 11;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-9-19. Harm Reduct J. 2012. PMID: 22687137 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of modified risk claim advertising formats for Camel Snus.Health Educ J. 2017 Dec;76(8):971-985. doi: 10.1177/0017896917729723. Epub 2017 Sep 20. Health Educ J. 2017. PMID: 38974785 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of the relation between European and American smokeless tobacco and oral cancer.BMC Public Health. 2007 Nov 15;7:334. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-334. BMC Public Health. 2007. PMID: 18005437 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco industry consumer research on smokeless tobacco users and product development.Am J Public Health. 2010 Jan;100(1):78-87. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.152603. Am J Public Health. 2010. PMID: 19910355 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous