Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Dec;6(12):690-6; quiz 697.
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03704.x.

Metabolic properties of vasodilating beta blockers: management considerations for hypertensive diabetic patients and patients with the metabolic syndrome

Affiliations
Review

Metabolic properties of vasodilating beta blockers: management considerations for hypertensive diabetic patients and patients with the metabolic syndrome

Stephan Jacob et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2004 Dec.

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes and hypertension are both insulin-resistant states that impose an excessive risk burden for future major cardiovascular events, including coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists are effective for the treatment of hypertension, but they are underused in diabetic patients because of possible adverse effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, including insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and dyslipidemia. Traditional beta blockers, both nonselective and selective, are vasoconstrictive due to unopposed alpha1 activity; however, vasodilating beta blockers are not associated with these negative metabolic effects. This review discusses the background of insulin resistance and its link to diabetes and hypertension, emphasizing the role of vascular control by the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems on insulin sensitivity and glucose utilization. Clinical evidence is reviewed for the use of vasodilating beta blockers in the treatment of hypertension and in reducing cardiovascular risk in the diabetic population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between blood pressure and insulin resistance. Adapted with permission from Endocr Pract. 2003;9:43–49. 20
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparative acute hemodynamic effects of different β blockers. HR=heart rate; CI=cardiac index; Ees=end systolic elastane; PWP=mean pulmonary wedge pressure; SVR=systemic vascular resistance. Adapted with permission from Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:26L‐40L. 32

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report . Circulation. 2002;106:3143–3421. - PubMed
    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, et al. Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110:227–239. - PubMed
    1. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38 . UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998;317:703–713. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, et al. Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12‐yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:434–444. - PubMed
    1. Lindholm LH, Ibsen H, Dahlof B, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. 2002;359:1004–1010. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms