Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics
- PMID: 15599283
- DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000147739.42354.a9
Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics
Abstract
Study design: An in vitro biomechanical study of C4-C5 intervertebral disc replacement using a cadaveric model.
Objectives: To investigate the degree of motion afforded by a ball-and-socket cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis design.
Summary of background data: Intervertebral disc prostheses designs attempt to restore or maintain cervical disc motion after anterior cervical discectomy and reduce the likelihood of accelerated degeneration in adjacent discs by maintaining normal motion at the affected disc level. Surprisingly, the actual kinetic and biomechanical effects that cervical disc arthroplasty imparts on the spine have not been widely reported. Accordingly, we investigated what effect implanting a cervical disc prosthesis has on the range of motion at the affected level as well as how it changes the coupled motion patterns at the level of implantation.
Methods: Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric cervical spines (C2-C7) were used in this study. We evaluated two different spinal conditions: intact and after disc replacement at C4-C5. Compression (using the follower load concept) and pure moment loading were applied to the specimen. Range of motion was measured using an optical tracking system. Statistical differences between the intact and replaced condition range of motion was determined using analysis of variance with post hoc comparisons (alpha = 0.05).
Results: The data indicate that the intervertebral disc prosthesis approximated the intact motion in all three rotation planes at the affected level. Finally, changes in cervical coupled rotations, specifically lateral bending during axial rotation loading and axial rotation during lateral bending loading, were not statistically significant between the two tested conditions.
Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that a ball-and-socket design can replicate physiologic motion at the affected and adjacent levels. More importantly, the data indicate that motion coupling, which is most dramatic in the cervical spine and plays an important biomechanical role, is maintained.
Similar articles
-
In vitro evaluation of a ball-and-socket cervical disc prosthesis with cranial geometric center.J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Nov;11(5):538-46. doi: 10.3171/2009.6.SPINE0949. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009. PMID: 19929355
-
Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):S176-85. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092219.28382.0C. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003. PMID: 14560189
-
Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20362252
-
Biomechanics of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Devices.Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021 Oct;32(4):493-504. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Jul 30. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021. PMID: 34538475 Review.
-
Intervertebral disc arthroplasty.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2779-86. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146460.11591.8a. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004. PMID: 15564927 Review.
Cited by
-
Reoperations Following Cervical Disc Replacement.Asian Spine J. 2015 Jun;9(3):471-82. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.471. Epub 2015 Jun 8. Asian Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26097667 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Initial clinical experience with a next-generation artificial disc for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative cervical radiculopathy.SAS J. 2010 Mar 1;4(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.002. eCollection 2010. SAS J. 2010. PMID: 25802644 Free PMC article.
-
The Changes in Cervical Biomechanics After CTDR and Its Association With Heterotopic Ossification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Global Spine J. 2021 May;11(4):565-574. doi: 10.1177/2192568220922949. Epub 2020 Jun 3. Global Spine J. 2021. PMID: 32677512 Free PMC article.
-
[Cervical disc prostheses].Orthopade. 2006 Mar;35(3):347-59; quiz 360-1. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0928-8. Orthopade. 2006. PMID: 16489466 Review. German.
-
Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs.JOR Spine. 2018 Dec 17;1(4):e1040. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1040. eCollection 2018 Dec. JOR Spine. 2018. PMID: 31463455 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous