Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Nov;45(11):924-30.

Impact of Giardia vaccination on asymptomatic Giardia infections in dogs at a research facility

Affiliations

Impact of Giardia vaccination on asymptomatic Giardia infections in dogs at a research facility

Kirsten A Anderson et al. Can Vet J. 2004 Nov.

Abstract

Feces were collected from 107 asymptomatic dogs at a research facility in Guelph, Ontario. The prevalence of Giardia infection was 11% (12/107). To assess the effectiveness of Giardia vaccination for treatment of Giardia carriage, 9 additional asymptomatic Giardia antigen-positive dogs were brought into the facility. The Giardia antigen-positive dogs were then randomly allocated to receive either vaccine (n = 10) or a saline placebo (n = 10). Feces were then monitored monthly for 6 mo for Giardia antigen and Giardia cysts. At weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 following vaccination, there were more Giardia-positive dogs in the vaccinated group (10/10, 9/10, 9/10, 8/10, respectively) compared with the controls (7/10, 7/10, 8/10, 4/10, respectively). At week 20, an equal number of dogs (5/10) were Giardia positive, and at week 24, fewer dogs were positive in the vaccinated group than in the control group (2/10 versus 5/10, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Vaccination was, therefore, not an effective treatment for asymptomatic canine Giardia infections in this setting.

RésuméImpact de la vaccination contre la giardiose sur les infections asymptomatiques à Giardia chez des chiens hébergés dans un établissement de recherche. Des fèces ont été recueillies chez 107 chiens asymptomatiques gardés dans des installations de recherche à Guelph en Ontario. La prévalence de l’infection à Giardia était de 11 % (12/107). Pour vérifier l’efficacité de la vaccination contre la giardiose dans le traitement du microbisme latent, 9 chiens additionnels, asymptomatiques mais positifs aux antigènes de Giardia, ont été introduits dans les locaux. Les chiens positifs aux antigènes de Giardia ont été répartis au hasard en deux groupes recevant soit le vaccin (n = 10), soit le placebo salin (n = 10). Les fèces ont été analysées mensuellement pendant 6 mois afin de détecter les antigènes et les kystes de Giardia. Aux semaines 4, 8, 12 et 16 suivant la vaccination, ily avait plus de chiens Giardia positifs dans le groupe vacciné (10/10, 9/10, 9/10, 8/10, respectivement) que dans le groupe témoin (7/10, 7/10, 8/10, 4/10, respectivement). À la semaine 20, un nombre égal de chiens (5/10) étaient Giardia positifs et à la semaine 24, moins de chiens étaient positifs dans le groupe vacciné en comparaison avec le groupe témoin (2/10 versus 5/10, respectivement). Cependant, il n’y avait pas de différence significative entre les 2 groupes. Dans le cas présent, la vaccination ne constituait donc pas un traitement efficace contre les infections asymptomatiques à Giardia.

(Traduit par Docteur André Blouin)

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Giardia infection status of asymptomatic Giardia-positive dogsa, administered either vaccine or saline at weeks 0 and 3, and Giardia-negative controls. a Giardia positive = Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) positive and/or zinc sulphate positive.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Giardia infection status of asymptomatic Giardia-positive dogsa, administered either vaccine or saline at weeks 0 and 3, and Giardia-negative controls. a Giardia positive = zinc sulphate flotation positive. Two group 1 dogs and 3 group 2 dogs were enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) positive but zinc sulphate flotation negative at day 0.

References

    1. Leib MS, Zajac AM. Giardia: diagnosis and treatment. In: Bonagura JD, ed. Current Veterinary Therapy XII: Small Animal Practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995:716–719.
    1. Marshall MM, Naumovitz D, Ortega Y, Sterling CR. Waterborne protozoan pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:67–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jacobs SR, Forrester CPR, Yang J. A survey of the prevalence of Giardia in dogs presented to Canadian veterinary practices. Can Vet J. 2001;42:45–46. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirkpatrick CE. Epizootiology of endoparasitic infections in pet dogs and cats presented to a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Parasitol. 1988;30:113–124. - PubMed
    1. Barr SC, Bowman DD, Erb HN. Evaluation of two test procedures for diagnosis of giardiasis in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 1992;53:2028–2031. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources