Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients
- PMID: 15606585
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00700.x
Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients
Abstract
Objective: Mesorectal excision is successfully implemented as the standard surgical technique for rectal cancer resections in Norway. This technique has been associated with higher rates of anastomotic leakage (AL) and the purpose of this study was to examine AL in a large national cohort of patients.
Methods: This was a prospective national cohort study of 1958 patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery with anterior resection in Norway from November 1993 to December 1999.
Results: The overall rate of AL was 11.6% (228 of 1958 patients). In a multivariate analysis, the risk of AL was significantly higher in males (odds ratio (OR) 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.2), in patients receiving pre-operative radiotherapy (OR 2.2, CI 1.0-4.7) and in low level (4-6 cm) (OR 3.5, CI 1.6-7.7) and ultra-low level (< or = 3 cm) anastomoses (OR 5.4, CI 2.3-12.9). The presence of a diverting stoma was associated with a 60% reduction in the risk of AL (OR 0.4, CI 0.3-0.7) for anastomoses 6 cm and below. 30-day mortality was significantly higher for the patients with AL (7.0%, CI 3.7-10.3) compared with no AL (2.4%, CI 1.7-3.2) AL had no significant effect on local recurrence rate (log rank P=0.608).
Conclusion: Low anastomoses should be defunctioned to avoid AL and the associated high perioperative mortality. No effect of AL on local recurrence was found in this large cohort.
Similar articles
-
Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection.Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jan;47(1):48-58. doi: 10.1007/s10350-003-0012-y. Epub 2004 Jan 14. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004. PMID: 14719151
-
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after preoperative chemoradiation therapy and low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer.Rev Invest Clin. 2006 May-Jun;58(3):204-10. Rev Invest Clin. 2006. PMID: 16958295
-
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;6(6):462-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x. Colorectal Dis. 2004. PMID: 15521937
-
[Anastomotic leakage after traditional surgery of the colon and rectum].Minerva Chir. 2003 Apr;58(2):167-74. Minerva Chir. 2003. PMID: 12738926 Review. Italian.
-
[Surgical treatment of carcinoma of the left colon and rectum as an emergency. A new method for assessing operative risk].Ann Ital Chir. 2003 Mar-Apr;74(2):169-75; discussion 176. Ann Ital Chir. 2003. PMID: 14577113 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Latest Advances in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020 Jul 20;2020:8928109. doi: 10.1155/2020/8928109. eCollection 2020. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020. PMID: 32765603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single versus double stapling anastomotic technique in rectal cancer surgery.Surg Today. 2014 Jun;44(6):1026-31. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0646-x. Epub 2013 Jun 26. Surg Today. 2014. PMID: 23801054
-
Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial.Ann Surg. 2007 Aug;246(2):207-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180603024. Ann Surg. 2007. PMID: 17667498 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival following surgery for T4 colorectal cancer.BMC Surg. 2018 Oct 17;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0419-y. BMC Surg. 2018. PMID: 30332994 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an international grading system following anterior resection for rectal cancer.PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e75519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075519. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24086552 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources