Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Dec 20;4(1):26.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-4-26.

Protocol for the evaluation of a decision aid for women with a breech-presenting baby [ISRCTN14570598]

Affiliations

Protocol for the evaluation of a decision aid for women with a breech-presenting baby [ISRCTN14570598]

Christine L Roberts et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is now good evidence about the management options for pregnant women with a breech presentation (buttocks or feet rather than head-first) at term; external cephalic version (ECV) - the turning of a breech baby to a head-down position and/or planned caesarean section (CS). Each of these options has benefits and risks and the relative importance of these vary for each woman, subject to her personal values and preferences, a situation where a decision aid may be helpful.Decision aids are designed to assist patients and their doctors in making informed decisions using information that is unbiased and based on high quality research evidence. Decision aids are non-directive in the sense that they do not aim to steer the user towards any one option, but rather to support decision making which is informed and consistent with personal values.The ECV decision aid was developed using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, including a systematic review of the evidence about the benefits and risks of the options for breech pregnancy. It comprises an audiotape with a supplementary booklet and worksheet, a format that can be taken home and discussed with a partner. This project aims to evaluate the ECV decision aid for women with a breech presenting baby in late pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the decision aid compared with usual care in a randomised controlled trial in maternity hospitals that offer ECV. The study group will receive the decision aid in addition to usual care and the control group will receive standard information on management options for breech presentation from their usual pregnancy care provider. Approximately 184 women with a single breech-presenting baby at greater than 34 weeks gestation and who are clinically eligible for ECV will be recruited for the trial.The primary outcomes of the study are knowledge, decisional conflict, anxiety and satisfaction with decision-making that will be assessed using self-administered questionnaires. The decision aid is not intended to influence either the uptake of either ECV or planned CS, however we will monitor health service utilisation rates and maternal and perinatal outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schema of ECV decision aid trial

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roberts CL, Algert CS, Peat B, Henderson-Smart D. Small fetal size: a risk factor for breech birth at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999;67:1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00116-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts CL, Peat B, Algert CS, Henderson-Smart D. Term breech birth in New South Wales, 1990–1997. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;40:23–29. - PubMed
    1. Hannah M, Hannah W, Hewson S, Hodnett E, Saigal S, Willan A. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–1383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery (Cochrane Review) The Cochrane Library, Issue 2 Oxford: Update Software. 2003. - PubMed
    1. Roberts CL, Nassar N, Raynes-Greenow CH, Peat B. Update on the management of term breech deliveries in NSW, Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;43:173. doi: 10.1046/j.0004-8666.2003.00043.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources