Contribution of drinking water to the weekly intake of heterotrophic bacteria from diet in the United States
- PMID: 15607184
- DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.09.010
Contribution of drinking water to the weekly intake of heterotrophic bacteria from diet in the United States
Abstract
The goal of this study was to assess the relative contribution of heterotrophic bacteria from various sources in the normal diet of an average person in the United States, due to concerns regarding the potential health implications of such bacteria in household tapwater. A literature search was conducted to determine the concentration of heterotrophic plate count (HPC) bacteria in drinking water, as well as foods common to the American diet. Food items were also obtained in Tucson, AZ to further evaluate the consumption of HPC and total coliform bacteria. This was compared to a recent study on HPC bacteria in tapwater with and without POU devices mounted on the tap in Tucson, AZ households. It was determined that only 0.048-4.5% of the average consumer's total heterotrophic bacteria intake is derived from drinking water. Thus, HPC bacteria in drinking water do not represent a significant exposure of total HPC bacteria in the average diet of consumers in the United States.
Similar articles
-
Tracking the concentration of heterotrophic plate count bacteria from the source to the consumer's tap.Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 May 1;92(3):289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.08.021. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15145587
-
Heterotrophic plate count bacteria--what is their significance in drinking water?Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 May 1;92(3):265-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.08.017. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15145585 Review.
-
Virulence and risk from drinking water of heterotrophic plate count bacteria in human population groups.Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 May 1;92(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.08.012. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15145584 Review.
-
Heterotrophic plate count and consumer's health under special consideration of water softeners.Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 May 1;92(3):365-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.08.007. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004. PMID: 15145595
-
Comparison of the microbiologic quality of point-of-use (POU)-treated water and tap water.Int J Environ Health Res. 2004 Aug;14(4):253-60. doi: 10.1080/09603120410001725595. Int J Environ Health Res. 2004. PMID: 15369990
Cited by
-
Biological approaches for addressing the grand challenge of providing access to clean drinking water.J Biol Eng. 2011 Mar 31;5(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-5-2. J Biol Eng. 2011. PMID: 21453515 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of waterborne illness via drinking water in the United States.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008;192:117-58. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-71724-1_4. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18020305 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The bacteriological quality of different brands of bottled water available to consumers in Ile-Ife, south-western Nigeria.BMC Res Notes. 2014 Nov 28;7:859. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-859. BMC Res Notes. 2014. PMID: 25432739 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous