Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm
- PMID: 15609382
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4834
Impact of a surgical training programme on rectal cancer outcomes in Stockholm
Abstract
Background: Total mesorectal excision (TME) and use of adjuvant radiotherapy are major advances in the treatment of rectal cancer that have emerged in the past 20 years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an initiative to teach the TME technique on outcomes at 5 years after surgery.
Methods: TME-based surgery was introduced in Stockholm in 1994. The study population comprised all 447 patients who underwent abdominal operations for rectal cancer in Stockholm County during 1995 and 1996. Outcomes were compared with those in the Stockholm I (790 patients) and Stockholm II (542 patients) radiotherapy trials.
Results: The permanent stoma rate was reduced from 60.3 and 55.3 per cent in the Stockholm I and II trials respectively to 26.5 per cent in the TME project (P < 0.001). Five-year local recurrence rates decreased from 21.9 and 19.1 per cent to 8.2 per cent respectively (P < 0.001). Five-year cancer-specific survival rates increased from 66.0 and 65.7 per cent in the Stockholm trials to 77.3 per cent in the TME project (hazard ratio 0.62 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.49 to 0.80); P < 0.001).
Conclusion: A surgical teaching programme had a major impact on rectal cancer outcome.
Similar articles
-
The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer.Br J Surg. 2002 Aug;89(8):1008-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02151.x. Br J Surg. 2002. PMID: 12153626
-
[Improved therapeutic results in rectal cancer. Preoperative radiotherapy and continuing education of the surgeons is efficient].Lakartidningen. 2000 Aug 23;97(34):3582-6. Lakartidningen. 2000. PMID: 11036377 Clinical Trial. Swedish.
-
Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.Br J Surg. 2002 Sep;89(9):1142-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02196.x. Br J Surg. 2002. PMID: 12190680 Clinical Trial.
-
[Skills by training. Education and case volume are strong prognostic factors in rectal cancer surgery].Lakartidningen. 2005 Feb 7-13;102(6):374-6. Lakartidningen. 2005. PMID: 15754678 Review. Swedish.
-
[Combined radiotherapy and surgery is best against rectal cancer].Lakartidningen. 1998 Sep 23;95(39):4216-20. Lakartidningen. 1998. PMID: 9785768 Review. Swedish.
Cited by
-
Utilizing the multidisciplinary team for planning and monitoring care and quality improvement.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2015 Mar;28(1):12-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545065. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2015. PMID: 25733969 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The current landscape of locally advanced rectal cancer.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 9;8(11):649-59. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.118. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21826084 Review.
-
Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial.Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):821-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60485-2. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19269520 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of socioeconomic aspects and hospital case volume on survival in colorectal cancer in Saxony, Germany.BMC Cancer. 2023 Mar 10;23(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10672-1. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 36899313 Free PMC article.
-
The role of caseload in determining outcome following laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: an observational study.Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):134-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3139-5. Epub 2013 Sep 20. Surg Endosc. 2014. PMID: 24052341
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous