A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study
- PMID: 15611489
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00008
A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study
Abstract
Background: Conflicting evidence exists about the effectiveness of spinal manipulation.
Objective: To validate a manipulation clinical prediction rule.
Design: Multicenter randomized, controlled trial.
Setting: Physical therapy clinics.
Patients: 131 consecutive patients with low back pain, 18 to 60 years of age, who were referred to physical therapy.
Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive manipulation plus exercise or exercise alone by a physical therapist for 4 weeks.
Measurements: Patients were examined according to the clinical prediction rule criteria (symptom duration, symptom location, fear-avoidance beliefs, lumbar mobility, and hip rotation range of motion). Disability and pain at 1 and 4 weeks and 6 months were assessed.
Results: Outcome from spinal manipulation depends on a patient's status on the prediction rule. Treatment effects are greatest for the subgroup of patients who were positive on the rule (at least 4 of 5 criteria met); health care utilization among this subgroup was decreased at 6 months. Compared with patients who were negative on the rule and received exercise, the odds of a successful outcome among patients who were positive on the rule and received manipulation were 60.8 (95% CI, 5.2 to 704.7). The odds were 2.4 (CI, 0.83 to 6.9) among patients who were negative on the rule and received manipulation and 1.0 (CI, 0.28 to 3.6) among patients who were positive on the rule and received exercise. A patient who was positive on the rule and received manipulation has a 92% chance of a successful outcome, with an associated number needed to treat for benefit at 4 weeks of 1.9 (CI, 1.4 to 3.5).
Limitations: The response rate for the 6-month follow-up resulted in inadequate power to detect statistically significant differences for some comparisons.
Conclusions: The spinal manipulation clinical prediction rule can be used to improve decision making for patients with low back pain.
Comment in
-
Treatments for back pain: can we get past trivial effects?Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21;141(12):957-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00012. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15611493 No abstract available.
-
Treatments for back pain.Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 17;142(10):874. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-10-200505170-00023. Ann Intern Med. 2005. PMID: 15897545 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Identifying patients with low back pain who are likely to benefit from spinal manipulation.Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21;141(12):I39. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00003. Ann Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15611484 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Dec 15;27(24):2835-43. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200212150-00021. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002. PMID: 12486357
-
Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial [NCT00257998].BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Feb 10;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-11. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006. PMID: 16472379 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Early Physical Therapy vs Usual Care in Patients With Recent-Onset Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2015 Oct 13;314(14):1459-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11648. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26461996 Clinical Trial.
-
Examination of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from thoracic spine thrust manipulation and a general cervical range of motion exercise: multi-center randomized clinical trial.Phys Ther. 2010 Sep;90(9):1239-50. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100123. Epub 2010 Jul 15. Phys Ther. 2010. PMID: 20634268 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of therapeutic exercise versus manual therapy on athletes with chronic low back pain.J Sport Rehabil. 2011 Nov;20(4):494-504. doi: 10.1123/jsr.20.4.494. Epub 2011 Aug 8. J Sport Rehabil. 2011. PMID: 21904004 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical presentation and manual therapy for lower quadrant musculoskeletal conditions.J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Nov;19(4):212-22. doi: 10.1179/106698111X13129729552029. J Man Manip Ther. 2011. PMID: 23115474 Free PMC article.
-
Management of low back pain and lumbosacral radicular syndrome: the Guideline of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF).Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Apr;60(2):292-318. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08352-7. Epub 2024 Feb 26. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024. PMID: 38407016 Free PMC article.
-
Short-term response of hip mobilizations and exercise in individuals with chronic low back pain: a case series.J Man Manip Ther. 2011 May;19(2):100-7. doi: 10.1179/2042618610Y.0000000007. J Man Manip Ther. 2011. PMID: 22547920 Free PMC article.
-
Sub-group Classification of Low Back Related Leg Pain: Is this the Catalyst Needed for Other Challenging Conditions?J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(2):70-2. doi: 10.1179/106698109790824677. J Man Manip Ther. 2009. PMID: 20046547 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Short-term effect of muscle energy technique on pain in individuals with non-specific lumbopelvic pain: a pilot study.J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(1):E14-8. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.1.14E. J Man Manip Ther. 2009. PMID: 20046557 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous