Similar adherence rates favor different virologic outcomes for patients treated with nonnucleoside analogues or protease inhibitors
- PMID: 15614706
- DOI: 10.1086/426595
Similar adherence rates favor different virologic outcomes for patients treated with nonnucleoside analogues or protease inhibitors
Abstract
Background: This prospective study verified the effect of adherence on the risk of virologic failure.
Methods: At enrollment in the study, a total of 543 patients who were following a steady (duration, >or=6 months) and effective (viral load, <50 human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] RNA copies/mL) regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) completed a self-reported questionnaire derived from the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group Adherence Follow-up Questionnaire. Patients were followed up for the subsequent 6 months to document virologic failure, which was defined as 2 consecutive viral load measurements of >500 HIV RNA copies/mL.
Results: Only the type of treatment and the adherence rate at baseline were significantly associated with the virologic end point. Among patients who reported an adherence rate of <or=75%, the rate of virologic failure was 17.4%; this rate decreased to 12.2% for patients whose adherence rate was 76%-85%, to 4.3% for patients whose adherence rate was 86%-95%, and to 2.4% for patients whose adherence rate was >95%. When analysis was adjusted according to the type of regimen received, patients who were receiving protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART and who had an adherence rate of up to 85% had a virologic failure rate of >20%, whereas, only for patients who were receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based HAART and who had an adherence rate of <or=75%, the virologic failure rate was >10%. For the comparison of NNRTI-treated patients and PI-treated patients with an adherence rate of 75%-95%, the odds ratio was 0.157 (95% confidence interval, 0.029-0.852). The number of pills and daily doses received correlated with the reported adherence rate.
Conclusions: Patients receiving NNRTIs report a higher rate of adherence than do patients receiving PIs. Adherence is significantly influenced by the number of pills and daily doses received. Low adherence is a major determinant of virologic failure; however, different therapies have different cutoff values for adherence that determine a significant increment of risk.
Comment in
-
Are nonnucleoside analogue-based regimens better than protease inhibitor-based regimens for nonadherent HIV-infected patients?Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jan 1;40(1):164-6. doi: 10.1086/426596. Epub 2004 Dec 6. Clin Infect Dis. 2005. PMID: 15614707 No abstract available.
-
A clinically dangerous flaw in reporting statistical significance.Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;42(8):1205-6; author repy 1206-7. doi: 10.1086/502655. Clin Infect Dis. 2006. PMID: 16575745 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
