Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan;88(1):84-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.09.015.

Limitations of the pelvic examination for evaluation of the female pelvic organs

L A Padilla  1 , D M Radosevich, M P Milad
Affiliations

Limitations of the pelvic examination for evaluation of the female pelvic organs

L A Padilla et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To assess factors influencing an accurate pelvic examination under the best possible circumstances.

Methods: Before undergoing laparoscopy or laparotomy, 84 women under general anesthesia underwent pelvic examinations by an attending gynecologist, a gynecology resident, and a medical student blinded to the indication for surgery. Surgical findings were compared with the examiners' findings. Dependent variables (uterine size, uterine contour, and presence of adnexal masses) and effect modifiers (examiner experience and body mass index) were analyzed.

Results: The overall pelvic examination was accurate 70.2% of the time for attending gynecologists, 64.0% for residents, and 57.3% for medical students. The sensitivity to detect adnexal masses was much lower than the sensitivity to assess uterine size or uterine contour. Obesity noticeably reduced detection of adnexal masses.

Conclusion: The bimanual examination appears to be a limited screening test for the female upper genital tract even under the best possible circumstances. Uterine assessment appears to be more accurate than adnexal assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer