Spatial association of homologous pericentric regions in human lymphocyte nuclei during repair
- PMID: 15626712
- PMCID: PMC1305280
- DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.048728
Spatial association of homologous pericentric regions in human lymphocyte nuclei during repair
Abstract
Spatial positioning of pericentric chromosome regions in human lymphocyte cell nuclei was investigated during repair after H(2)O(2)/L-histidine treatment. Fifteen to three-hundred minutes after treatment, these regions of chromosomes 1, 15, and X were labeled by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The relative locus distances (LL-distances), the relative distances to the nuclear center (LC-distances), and the locus-nuclear center-locus angles (LCL-angles) were measured in approximately 5000 nuclei after two-dimensional microscopy. Experimental frequency histograms were compared to control data from untreated stimulated and quiescent (G(0)) nuclei and to a theoretical two-dimensional projection from random points. Based on the frequency distributions of the LL-distances and the LCL-angles, an increase of closely associated labeled regions was found shortly after repair activation. For longer repair times this effect decreased. After 300 min the frequency distribution of the LL-distances was found to be compatible with the random distance distribution again. The LL-distance frequency histograms for quiescent nuclei did not significantly differ from the theoretical random distribution, although this was the case for the stimulated control of chromosomes 15 and X. It may be inferred that, concerning the distances, homologous pericentric regions appear not to be randomly distributed during S-phase, and are subjected to dynamic processes during replication and repair.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Topography of genetic elements of X-chromosome relative to the cell nucleus and to the chromosome X territory determined for human lymphocytes.Gene. 2002 Jun 12;292(1-2):13-24. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(02)00667-4. Gene. 2002. PMID: 12119095
-
Image-based modeling reveals dynamic redistribution of DNA damage into nuclear sub-domains.PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Aug;3(8):e155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030155. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007. PMID: 17676951 Free PMC article.
-
Ionizing radiation-induced instant pairing of heterochromatin of homologous chromosomes in human cells.Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;104(1-4):193-9. doi: 10.1159/000077488. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004. PMID: 15162037
-
Visualization of the spatial positioning of the SNRPN, UBE3A, and GABRB3 genes in the normal human nucleus by three-color 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization.Chromosome Res. 2012 Aug;20(6):659-72. doi: 10.1007/s10577-012-9300-5. Epub 2012 Jul 17. Chromosome Res. 2012. PMID: 22801776 Free PMC article.
-
Interindividual differences in initial DNA repair capacity when evaluating H2O2-induced DNA damage in extended-term cultures of human lymphocytes using the comet assay.Cell Biol Toxicol. 2007 Nov;23(6):401-11. doi: 10.1007/s10565-007-9002-5. Epub 2007 Apr 11. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2007. PMID: 17429744
Cited by
-
Radiation induced chromatin conformation changes analysed by fluorescent localization microscopy, statistical physics, and graph theory.PLoS One. 2015 Jun 4;10(6):e0128555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128555. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26042422 Free PMC article.
-
Long non-coding RNA SeT and miR-155 regulate the Tnfα gene allelic expression profile.PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184788. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28910376 Free PMC article.
-
A Paradigm Revolution or Just Better Resolution-Will Newly Emerging Superresolution Techniques Identify Chromatin Architecture as a Key Factor in Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Repair Regulation?Cancers (Basel). 2020 Dec 23;13(1):18. doi: 10.3390/cancers13010018. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33374540 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chromosome variant 1qh- and its influence on the 3D organization of chromosome 1 heterochromatin in interphase nucleus of patients with endometriosis.J Genet. 2014 Apr;93(1):219-23. doi: 10.1007/s12041-014-0340-9. J Genet. 2014. PMID: 24840844 No abstract available.
-
Elucidation of the Clustered Nano-Architecture of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Sites and Surrounding Chromatin in Cancer Cells: A Single Molecule Localization Microscopy Approach.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 31;22(7):3636. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073636. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33807337 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abdel-Halim, H. I., S. A. Imam, F. M. Badr, A. T. Natarajan, L. H. F. Mullenders, and J. J. W. A. Boei. 2004. Ionizing radiation-induced instant pairing of heterochromatin of homologous chromosomes in human cells. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 104:193–199. - PubMed
-
- Amrichová, J., E. Lukásová, S. Kozubek, and M. Kozubek. 2003. Nuclear and territorial topography of chromosome telomeres in human lymphocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 289:11–26. - PubMed
-
- Arnoldus, E. P. J., A. C. B. Peters, G. T. A. Bots, A. K. Raap, and M. van der Ploeg. 1989. Somatic pairing of chromosome 1 centromeres in interphase nuclei of human cerebellum. Hum. Genet. 83:231–234. - PubMed
-
- Aten, J. A., J. Stap, P. M. Krawczyk, C. H. van Oven, R. A. Hoebe, J. Essers, and R. Kanaar. 2004. Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains. Science. 303:92–95. - PubMed
-
- Bártová, E., S. Kozubek, M. Durm, M. Hausmann, M. Kozubek, E. Lukášová, M. Skalniková, P. Jirsová, A. Cafourková, and K. Buchničková. 1999. The position of centromeres in the interphase nuclei of human leukemic cells during myeloid differentiation and after γ-irradiation. In Fluorescence Microscopy and Fluorescent Probes, Vol. 3. A. Kotyk, editor. Espero Publishing, Ustí Nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources