Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Mar-Apr;2(2):225-8.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880020217.

MR imaging and metallic implants for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of ferromagnetism and artifact

Affiliations

MR imaging and metallic implants for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: assessment of ferromagnetism and artifact

F G Shellock et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is contraindicated for patients with certain ferromagnetic implants, primarily because of potential risks related to movement or dislodgment of the devices. An additional problem with metallic implants is the potential image distortion that may affect the interpretation of the MR study. Since MR imaging is frequently useful for the evaluation of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the ferromagnetic qualities and artifacts associated with MR imaging were determined for five metallic orthopedic implants commonly used for this surgery. Only the Perfix interference screw displayed a substantial deflection force and caused extensive signal loss. Images of the knee of one patient with two Perfix screws in place were not interpretable because of the image distortion caused by these implants. Therefore, alternative nonferromagnetic implants should be considered for reconstruction of the ACL.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources