Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1992 Apr;43(2):93-9.

Tinnitus: imaging algorithms

Affiliations
  • PMID: 1562895
Review

Tinnitus: imaging algorithms

R A Willinsky. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1992 Apr.

Abstract

The causes of tinnitus can be grouped according to whether the noise is continuous or pulsatile, whether it is subjective or objective and whether there is a retrotympanic mass. Imaging algorithms can be based on these symptoms and signs. For patients with nonpulsatile tinnitus and a normal drum, magnetic resonance imaging is preferred if a retrocochlear lesion is suspected, whereas high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is recommended if a cochlear abnormality is likely. If a chronic inflammation in the middle ear is suspected, HRCT is the study of choice to differentiate cholesteatoma from chronic otitis media. If the bruit is objective and the tympanic membrane normal, selective cerebral angiography should be the initial investigation, because most such patients have an acquired vascular abnormality, usually a dural arteriovenous fistula. If there is pulsatile tinnitus and a retrotympanic mass, HRCT should be the first examination because this technique allows differentiation of a vascular variation, such as an aberrant carotid artery or jugular dehiscence, from a paraganglioma.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources