On the methodological weakness of 'the effective number of codons': a reply to Marashi and Najafabadi
- PMID: 15629420
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.133
On the methodological weakness of 'the effective number of codons': a reply to Marashi and Najafabadi
Abstract
In a recent publication [Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 317 (2004) 957] it was proposed that the 'effective number of codons' (Nc) in a gene should be calculated by summing the individual amino acid Nc's using rounding whenever the codon homozygosities are lower than the reciprocal value of the number of members of the synonymous families. This led Marashi and Najafabadi to examine the consequences of individual re-adjustment when comparing observed Nc with the expected Nc under assumptions of no selection, and C=G and A=T [Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324 (2004) 1]. Clearly, the present methodology has some weaknesses; in this work, I discuss these in relation to the observations by Marashi and Najafabadi, and finally an alternative method for the calculation of Nc is introduced with the purpose of eliminating the need for re-adjustments.
Comment in
-
Towards a resolution on the inherent methodological weakness of the "effective number of codons used by a gene".Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005 May 20;330(4):1015-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.02.150. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005. PMID: 15823544
Comment on
-
How reliable re-adjustment is: correspondence regarding A. Fuglsang, "The 'effective number of codons' revisited".Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Nov 5;324(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.213. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004. PMID: 15464973
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources