Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct-Dec;5(4):225-30.
doi: 10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.225.

Follow-up result afters negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging for hepatic metastasis from rectal cancer

Affiliations

Follow-up result afters negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging for hepatic metastasis from rectal cancer

Joon Seok Lim et al. Korean J Radiol. 2004 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery.

Materials and methods: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging. When selecting patients who had undergone curative resection, the following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients in whom extrahepatic metastases were detected on preoperative staging work-ups, 2) patients in whom the surgery was judged to be non-curative due to peritoneal seeding or local aggressiveness. Cases with follow-up periods of less than 18 months were also excluded, as these cases were considered insufficient to confirm the negative outcomes. Thus, a total of 149 patients were ultimately enrolled in our study. The follow-up results of unenhanced MR imagings were assessed according to the assumption that the newly developed hepatic metastases had been false-negative lesions on preoperative MR image.

Results: During a median follow-up period of 29.3 months, 25 hepatic metastases were detected in 13 patients (8.7%), which indicated a negative predictive value of 91.3%.

Conclusion: Unenhanced hepatic MR imaging provides a high negative predictive value with regard to the detection of hepatic metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A 43 year-old-woman with rectal cancer. A, B. Preoperative MR images (T2-weighted single shot fast spin-echo image [17020/100] (A) and T1-weighted GRE image [230/4.0, 90° flip angle] (B)) show no evidence of metastasis in the liver. C. Low attenuating subcentimetric lesion (white arrow) can be seen in the lateral segment on the follow-up CT scan, obtained three months postoperatively. D. Growth of the lesion on the lateral segment (white arrow) can be seen on the CT scan at eight months postoperatively, which represents a metastasis.

References

    1. Welch JP, Donaldson GA. Detection and treatment of recurrent cancer of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg. 1978;135:505–511. - PubMed
    1. Finlay IG, McArdle CS. Occult hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1986;73:732–735. - PubMed
    1. Finlay IG, McArdle CS. The identification of patients at high risk following curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1982;69:583–584. - PubMed
    1. Scheele J, Stang R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Paul M. Resection of colorectal liver metastases. World J Surg. 1995;19:59–71. - PubMed
    1. Sugarbaker PH. Surgical decision making for large bowel cancer metastatic to the liver. Radiology. 1990;174:621–626. - PubMed

MeSH terms