Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan-Feb;7(1):29-41.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2005.05004.x.

Development and phenotypic correlations: the evolution of tooth shape in Sorex araneus

Affiliations

Development and phenotypic correlations: the evolution of tooth shape in Sorex araneus

P David Polly. Evol Dev. 2005 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Do morphogenetic processes cause common patterns of phenotypic covariation, and do those patterns evolve over microevolutionary timescales? Evolution of molar shape variance-covariance (P) matrixes was studied in five populations of the common shrew, Sorex araneus. P matrix evolution was assessed using matrix correlation, matrix disparity, and common principal component analysis (CPCA). Significant changes in covariance structure were found among the populations, but the differences were small. A computer model was used to estimate the theoretical covariance introduced into the phenotype by developmental interactions. Molar developmental processes explained some of the covariance in the shrew samples, especially as measured by matrix correlation, but the proportion was relatively small. Developmental principal components (PCs) were only infrequently associable with common principal components. The results suggest that molar shape P matrixes can evolve quickly in a manner only loosely constrained by development, and that their shared covariance is probably dominated by factors more proximate than development. Rarefaction showed that sample size severely affected P comparisons when n < 15 for matrix correlation and disparity, and when n < 30 for CPCA. Among CPCA evaluation criteria, Akaike Information Criterion performed better than jump-up at n < 30, but worse at n > 30.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources