Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Oct;158(3):279-84.
doi: 10.1007/s11046-004-0927-4.

Simple and reliable detection of slime production of Candida spp. directly from blood culture bottles: comparison of visual tube method and transmission electron microscopy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Simple and reliable detection of slime production of Candida spp. directly from blood culture bottles: comparison of visual tube method and transmission electron microscopy

Nilgun Cerikcioglu et al. Mycopathologia. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Early detection of slime production may be useful for clinical decision because of its suggestive property for potential pathogenic capacity of a Candida strain especially in patients with a prosthetic device. In this study we aimed to compare the visual tube method (VTM) with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in order to confirm the reliability of the former method. In order to demonstrate the reproducibility of the tube method and to determine the correct timing for the test, Candida isolates directly obtained from blood culture (DBC) bottles and their two subsequent subcultures were used. The results of this study showed that VTM is a simple and reliable method which can be used in every clinical mycology laboratory, provided that the test is applied on DBC isolates; as the ability of slime production is decreased or lost even after the first subculturing. We suggest that this simple method can be used and may have some contributions to the ongoing studies on the controversial issue concerning removal of biomaterials in candidemic patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Microbiology. 2003 Feb;149(Pt 2):353-62 - PubMed
    1. Infect Immun. 1983 Apr;40(1):432-5 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1986 Feb;153(2):332-9 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Oct 15;33(8):1387-92 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Oct 15;35(8):1021; author reply 1022 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources