Importance of water sorption and solubility studies for couple bonding agent--resin-based filling material
- PMID: 15646223
Importance of water sorption and solubility studies for couple bonding agent--resin-based filling material
Abstract
This study investigated the water sorption and solubility of two light-cured resin composites (Filtek P60 and Solitaire 2), one compomer (Compoglass F), one ormocer (Admira) and the associated bonding agents (Scotchbond 1 [Scotchbond 1 = Scotchbond Single Bond in USA], Gluma One Bond, Excite and Admira Bond, respectively) and of a RMGIC (Fuji II LC). Five disks of each product type were subjected to water sorption and solubility tests based on ISO 4049 requirements. The data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis and non-parametric multiple-comparison tests using ranked sums at 95% confidence interval. Fuji II LC showed the highest water sorption (167.5 microg/mm(-3)). Fuji II LC and Compoglass F had higher solubility values (8.3 and 10.0 microg/mm(-3), respectively) than the other materials. Bonding agents have very high water sorption and solubility values (between 77.4 and 355.4 microg/mm(-3) and between 75.9 and 144.9 microg/mm(-3), respectively) compared to the restorative materials. Gluma One Bond and Admira Bond showed lower sorption and solubility than Excite and Scotchbond 1.
Similar articles
-
Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.J Dent Child (Chic). 2008 May-Aug;75(2):125-33. J Dent Child (Chic). 2008. PMID: 18647507
-
Influence of initial water content on the subsequent water sorption and solubility behavior in restorative polymers.Am J Dent. 2005 Jun;18(3):177-81. Am J Dent. 2005. PMID: 16158809
-
Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.Oper Dent. 2004 Jan-Feb;29(1):100-4. Oper Dent. 2004. PMID: 14753340
-
Comparative study of sealing ability of two root-end-filling materials with and without the use of dentin-bonding agents.J Endod. 2004 Jan;30(1):35-7. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200401000-00007. J Endod. 2004. PMID: 14760905
-
Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins.Dent Mater. 2006 Oct;22(10):973-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.020. Epub 2006 Jan 6. Dent Mater. 2006. PMID: 16405987
Cited by
-
Bulk-fill restorative composites under simulated carious and erosive conditions.Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2022 Sep 30;35(2):111-119. doi: 10.54589/aol.35/2/111. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2022. PMID: 36260942 Free PMC article.
-
Physical-mechanical properties of Bis-EMA based root canal sealer with different fillers addition.J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):227-31. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.157259. J Conserv Dent. 2015. PMID: 26069410 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial properties, compressive strength and fluoride release capacity of essential oil-modified glass ionomer cements-an in vitro study.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1879-1888. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03493-0. Epub 2020 Aug 15. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 32803440
-
Influence of DPSS laser on polymerization shrinkage and mass change of resin composites.Photomed Laser Surg. 2011 Aug;29(8):545-50. doi: 10.1089/pho.2010.2897. Epub 2011 Mar 21. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011. PMID: 21417914 Free PMC article.
-
Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill, Conventional, and Flowable Resin Composites Stored Dry and Wet.Int J Dent. 2022 Feb 10;2022:7946239. doi: 10.1155/2022/7946239. eCollection 2022. Int J Dent. 2022. PMID: 35186087 Free PMC article.