Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):669-76.

Importance of water sorption and solubility studies for couple bonding agent--resin-based filling material

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15646223

Importance of water sorption and solubility studies for couple bonding agent--resin-based filling material

Eric Mortier et al. Oper Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

This study investigated the water sorption and solubility of two light-cured resin composites (Filtek P60 and Solitaire 2), one compomer (Compoglass F), one ormocer (Admira) and the associated bonding agents (Scotchbond 1 [Scotchbond 1 = Scotchbond Single Bond in USA], Gluma One Bond, Excite and Admira Bond, respectively) and of a RMGIC (Fuji II LC). Five disks of each product type were subjected to water sorption and solubility tests based on ISO 4049 requirements. The data were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis and non-parametric multiple-comparison tests using ranked sums at 95% confidence interval. Fuji II LC showed the highest water sorption (167.5 microg/mm(-3)). Fuji II LC and Compoglass F had higher solubility values (8.3 and 10.0 microg/mm(-3), respectively) than the other materials. Bonding agents have very high water sorption and solubility values (between 77.4 and 355.4 microg/mm(-3) and between 75.9 and 144.9 microg/mm(-3), respectively) compared to the restorative materials. Gluma One Bond and Admira Bond showed lower sorption and solubility than Excite and Scotchbond 1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

Substances