Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan;10(1):7-15.
doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.00579.x.

Heart rate variability fraction--a new reportable measure of 24-hour R-R interval variation

Affiliations

Heart rate variability fraction--a new reportable measure of 24-hour R-R interval variation

Maciej Sosnowski et al. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The scatterplot of R-R intervals has several unique features. Its numerical evaluation may produce a new useful index of global heart rate variability (HRV) from Holter recordings.

Methods: Two-hundred and ten middle-aged healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. The study was repeated the next day in 165 subjects. Each subject had a 24-hour ECG recording taken. Preprocessed data were transferred into a personal computer and the standard HRV time-domain indices: standard deviation of total normal R-R intervals (SDNN), standard deviation of averaged means of normal R-R intervals over 5-minute periods (SDANN), triangular index (TI), and pNN50 were determined. The scatterplot area (0.2-1.8 second) was divided into 256 boxes, each of 0.1-second interval, and the number of paired R-R intervals was counted. The heart rate variability fraction (HRVF) was calculated as the two highest counts divided by the number of total beats differing from the consecutive beat by <50 ms. The HRVF was obtained by subtracting this fraction from 1, and converting the result to a percentage.

Results: The normal value of the HRVF was 52.7 +/- 8.6%. The 2-98% range calculated from the normal probability plot was 35.1-70.3%. The HRVF varied significantly with gender (female 48.7 +/- 8.4% vs male 53.6 +/- 8.6%, P = 0.002). The HRVF correlated with RRI (r = 0.525) and showed a similar or better relationship with SDNN (0.851), SDANN (0.653), and TI (0.845) than did the standard HRV measures with each other. Bland-Altman plot showed a good day-by-day reproducibility of the HRVF, with the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.839 and a low relative standard error difference (1.8%).

Conclusion: We introduced a new index of HRV, which is easy for computation, robust, reproducible, easy to understand, and may overcome the limitations that belong to the standard HRV measures. This index, named HRV fraction, by combining magnitude, distribution, and heart-rate influences, might become a clinically useful index of global HRV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simplified view of a scatterplot of R‐R interval variation. Each square indicates the number (N) of pairs of successive R‐R intervals in a box of 0.1 s × 0.1 s grouped at different R‐R interval lengths (from 0.2 s up to 1.8 s). The two highest are easily seen as two black boxes, containing more than 20,000 pairs of R‐R intervals. These two counts are taken as figures N1 and N2 for the HRVF calculation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between HRVF and standard HRV measures. Raw HRVF data and log‐transformed standard HRV measures were drawn for plots and calculations.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bland‐Altman plots of reproducibility of all analyzed measures. Mean values shown in plots indicate mean difference between two day‐by‐day measurements, +1.96 × SD and –1.96 × SD values are also shown.

References

    1. Wolf MM, Varigos GA, Hunt D, et al Sinus arrhythmia in acute myocardial infarction. Med J Australia 1978;2: 52–53. - PubMed
    1. Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT, et al For the Multicenter Post‐Infarction Research Group. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1987;59: 256–262.DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90795-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Casolo G, Balli E, Taddei T, et al Decreased spontaneous heart rate variability in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1989;64: 1162–1167. - PubMed
    1. Gilham BA. Application of scatterplots to Holter ECG data. J Electrocardiol 1994;26(Suppl):31–33. - PubMed
    1. Woo MA, Stevenson WG, Moser DK, et al Patterns of beat‐to‐beat heart rate variability in advanced heart failure. Am Heart J 1992;123: 707–710. - PubMed