Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan 17;182(2):59-65.
doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06576.x.

Barriers to Australian physicians' and paediatricians' involvement in randomised controlled trials

Patrina H Y Caldwell  1 , Jonathan C Craig, Phyllis N Butow
Affiliations

Barriers to Australian physicians' and paediatricians' involvement in randomised controlled trials

Patrina H Y Caldwell et al. Med J Aust. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare attitudes of Australian physicians and paediatricians about treatment and randomised controlled trial (RCT) participation.

Design and participants: A cross-sectional survey using the validated "Physician Orientation Profile" (POP), with 250 physicians and 250 paediatricians surveyed.

Outcome measures: Five indices - primary allegiance, decision making under uncertainty, professional activities, perceived rewards, and peer-group influence - with scores for each participant ranging along a continuum from clinician-oriented to research-oriented and expressed as a number between 0 and 1.

Results: Overall response rate was 60%, with 135 physicians (54%) and 165 paediatricians (66%) responding. Paediatricians and physicians were similar in their attitudes to RCT participation, being generally clinician-oriented rather than research-oriented and less inclined to participate in RCTs when there is uncertainty about the best treatment. Most assign limited time to research, with 26.9% not currently involved in research and 31.5% having no experience of RCT participation. Doctors perceive few rewards and little peer-group influence regarding trial participation. Independent predictors of favourable attitudes to trial participation (based on POP scores) were the presence of allocated research time (0.37 for no allocated research time v 0.61 for > 70% research time; P < 0.0001), previous experience enrolling a patient in an RCT (0.40 for no experience v 0.46 for experience; P < 0.0001), and articles published in the past 12 months (0.40 for no publications v 0.55 for > 3 publications; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: This study highlights the minor importance of research for most Australian physicians. Research plays only a small role in their professional activities, and the importance of research participation is not recognised. They are clinician-oriented in their attitudes to RCT participation. To encourage greater involvement in trials among physicians in Australia, clinical research needs to be restructured in a primarily clinically oriented setting with dedicated research time.

PubMed Disclaimer