Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test
- PMID: 15652852
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.008
Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a presentation protocol for the new Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) distance stereoacuity test.
Design: Prospective data collection.
Methods: Stereoacuity was tested monocularly and binocularly in 95 patients with a variety of strabismic and nonstrabismic conditions, using the FD2, employing a modified staircase procedure. The Preschool Randot Stereoacuity test and the near Frisby test were used to determine whether a patient was stereoblind.
Results: Under monocular conditions, 35 (37%) of 95 patients passed at least the largest disparity of the FD2 indicating a problem with monocular cues. The binocular protocol was then modified to include a monocular test phase. Using the new protocol, if a patient could achieve the same stereoacuity under monocular and binocular conditions, they were deemed to have no stereopsis. Testing 28 additional stereoblind patients using the new modified protocol revealed no false positives.
Conclusion: The FD2 stereotest is a useful measure of distance stereoacuity, provided the presentation protocol accounts for monocular cues.
Comment in
-
Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;140(2):346-7; author reply 347-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.016. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 16086972 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test.Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;140(2):346-7; author reply 347-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.016. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 16086972 No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of FD2 (Frisby Davis distance) stereotest in surgical management of intermittent exotropia.Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;97(10):1318-21. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302321. Epub 2013 Jul 31. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23902676
-
Frisby Davis distance stereoacuity values in visually normal children.Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;89(11):1438-41. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.071761. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 16234448 Free PMC article.
-
Stereopsis: are we assessing it in enough depth?Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Jul;101(4):485-494. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12655. Epub 2018 Jan 27. Clin Exp Optom. 2018. PMID: 29377291 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Statistical normal values of visual parameters that characterize binocular function in children.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Nov;24(6):528-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00234.x. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004. PMID: 15491481 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of sensory outcomes in patients with successful motor outcome versus recurrent exotropia after surgery for intermittent exotropia.Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 1;12(1):13195. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17067-5. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35915206 Free PMC article.
-
New tests of distance stereoacuity and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia.Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun;114(6):1215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.066. Epub 2007 Jan 22. Ophthalmology. 2007. PMID: 17241665 Free PMC article.
-
Tests for detecting strabismus in children aged 1 to 6 years in the community.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 6;11(11):CD011221. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011221.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29105728 Free PMC article.
-
Binocular non-stereoscopic cues can deceive clinical tests of stereopsis.Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 8;9(1):5789. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42149-2. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30962466 Free PMC article.
-
Stereo vision and strabismus.Eye (Lond). 2015 Feb;29(2):214-24. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.279. Epub 2014 Dec 5. Eye (Lond). 2015. PMID: 25475234 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources