Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1992 Mar;69(3):236-41.
doi: 10.1097/00006324-199203000-00010.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements between optical and ultrasound pachometers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements between optical and ultrasound pachometers

C Giasson et al. Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Mar.

Abstract

The central corneal thickness measured by 2 methods was compared in 31 normal subjects. At each of the two examinations, central corneal thickness was evaluated by an ultrasonic and an optical method. Reliability was assessed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) between repeated measurements for the electronic digital and the Humphrey ultrasonic pachometers. The former revealed a systematic right-left difference, the left cornea being significantly thicker. This phenomenon has been observed in many studies and has been attributed to a measurement not done perpendicularly to the cornea. Angle lambda measured on eight subjects was nasal in all cases. A very high correlation coefficient was obtained between the two methods of central pachometry and the results obtained for the right eye by these two methods were not significantly different. Also, a small but significant negative correlation was observed between the central corneal curvature and the corneal thickness as evaluated by either pachometer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources