Loss of visual information in neglect: the effect of chromatic- versus luminance-contrast stimuli in a "what" task
- PMID: 15654582
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2207-4
Loss of visual information in neglect: the effect of chromatic- versus luminance-contrast stimuli in a "what" task
Abstract
One to four vertical bars were tachistoscopically presented at various eccentricities along the horizontal meridian to patients with right brain damage and neglect (n=7) and to a control group of right brain damaged patients without neglect (n=4). Luminance contrast stimuli and isoluminant chromatic contrast stimuli were used. The patients' task was to report the number of bars. With luminance stimuli the neglect patients' discrimination in the left visual field was reduced, particularly at the most leftward position tested (ca 20 degrees ) where about 20% of the bars were omitted. The loss of information was limited to luminance contrast stimuli. When chromatic contrast stimuli were used, accuracy was comparable in the two hemifields and between groups of patients. The differential pattern of results for chromatic and luminance contrast stimuli is consistent with the hypothesis of a selective deficit of the magno-cellular pathway in neglect.
Similar articles
-
Underestimation of contralateral space in neglect: a deficit in the "where" task.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Dec;159(3):319-28. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1954-6. Epub 2004 Jun 30. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15232668
-
VEP in neglect patients have longer latencies for luminance but not for chromatic patterns.Neuroreport. 1996 Feb 29;7(3):815-9. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199602290-00032. Neuroreport. 1996. PMID: 8733752 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of illusory spatial anisometry in unilateral neglect.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jan;154(2):226-37. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1650-y. Epub 2003 Oct 14. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 14557915
-
[Clinical aspects and mechanisms of visual-spatial neglect].Rev Neurol (Paris). 1989;145(8-9):626-34. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1989. PMID: 2682937 Review. French.
-
Functional circuitry underlying natural and interventional cancellation of visual neglect.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jan;154(2):127-53. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1660-9. Epub 2003 Nov 19. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 14625667 Review.
Cited by
-
The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.Exp Brain Res. 2008 Aug;189(4):411-20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1438-1. Epub 2008 Jun 7. Exp Brain Res. 2008. PMID: 18536911
-
Visually guided, aimed movements can be unaffected by stimulus-response uncertainty.Exp Brain Res. 2007 May;179(3):475-96. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0805-z. Epub 2007 Jan 23. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17242915
-
Magnocellular and parvocellular influences on reflexive attention.Vision Res. 2011 Aug 15;51(16):1820-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Jun 23. Vision Res. 2011. PMID: 21723311 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources