Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jan;100(1):186-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40893.x.

The limitations of gastro-jejunal (G-J) feeding tubes in children: a 9-year pediatric hospital database analysis

Affiliations

The limitations of gastro-jejunal (G-J) feeding tubes in children: a 9-year pediatric hospital database analysis

John E Fortunato et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan.

Abstract

Background: A gastro-jejunal (G-J) feeding tube is a safe and useful temporizing method of providing enteral access in children. Although G-J tubes are often used to obviate the need for a surgical jejunostomy, their long-term use is often associated with mechanical failure.

Aim: To review the clinically effective durability of G-J feeding tubes in providing enteral access in children.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 102 patients at the Johns Hopkins Children's Center from 1994-2003 whose underlying diagnosis necessitated the need for postpyloric enteral access.

Results: Long-term follow-up was obtained in 85 (48 M; 37 F) patients with a median (range) age of 2.0 (0.1-18.0) yr. The most common indication for G-J tube placement was gastroesophageal reflux with aspiration in 51 patients and feeding intolerance and vomiting in 19 patients. The mean (range) number of tube replacements was 2.2 (1-14) over a median (range) duration of follow-up of 39 (2-474) days. The indication for G-J tube replacement included: tube displacement (58), a clogged tube (41), and a cracked tube or ruptured balloon (35). In 52 cases, the cause for G-J tube replacement was undetermined.

Conclusions: G-J feeding tubes are associated with the frequent need for tube maintenance and replacement and may not be the most feasible clinical option in providing long-term (>1 month) enteral access in children intolerant to gastrostomy tube feeds. Future studies are needed to develop innovative percutaneous jejunostomy tube placement techniques that facilitate long-term enteral access.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

LinkOut - more resources