Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005;44(2):201-10.
doi: 10.2165/00003088-200544020-00005.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of antibacterials in vitro and in vivo using bacterial growth and kill kinetics: the minimum inhibitory concentration versus stationary concentration

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of antibacterials in vitro and in vivo using bacterial growth and kill kinetics: the minimum inhibitory concentration versus stationary concentration

Johan W Mouton et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005.

Abstract

Background: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is the in vitro reference value to describe the activity of an antibacterial against micro-organisms. It does not represent the dynamic effect of the antimicrobial at any point in time, but rather the total antimicrobial effect over the incubation period at a fixed concentration.

Objective: To explore the concentration-effect relationship of antimicrobial concentrations against micro-organisms in relation to the MIC.

Methods: Time-kill curves were generated for ceftazidime, meropenem and tobramycin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Hill equation with variable slope was fit to the time-kill data, and mathematical models of growth and kill were explored with reference to the MIC.

Results: With declining concentrations, bacterial killing will decrease until a specific threshold concentration is reached. This concentration, at which bacteria are neither killed nor able to grow, is named the stationary concentration (SC) and is not equal to the MIC. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulations over a range of kill rates, growth rates and slope factors showed that for beta-lactam antibacterials, the SC is close to the MIC value, which may explain why concentrations in vivo need to be above the MIC, while regrowth of bacteria occurs when concentrations decline below the MIC. For concentration-dependent antibacterials, such as aminoglycosides and quinolones, the SC is shown to be markedly different from the MIC and, in general, is much lower.

Conclusion: The MIC is not a good pharmacodynamic parameter to characterise the concentration effect relationship of a given antimicrobial. For 'concentration independent' antimicrobials the SC is likely to be close to the MIC, but may be much lower for 'concentration dependent' antimicrobials, and may explain sub-MIC effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Mar;40(3):784-6 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Apr;41(4):733-8 - PubMed
    1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Apr;41(4):451-9 - PubMed
    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Jul-Aug;8 Suppl 3:S279-91 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Nov;31(11):1859-60 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources